UPASANA PROJECTS PVT. LTD. (NAME CHANGED TO UNIQUE LIVING HOMES PVT. LTD.) (NOW KNOWN AS UNIQUE ,LIVING HOMES LLP), JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD-1(1), JAIPUR, JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the share application money had been refunded back by the assessee to the company. Considering the facts and circumstances, the addition sustained by the lower authorities was not justified.
What were the facts?
The assessee received share application money from a company alleged to be a dummy/bogus entity. The assessee contended that the entire share application money was subsequently returned to the company, supported by bank statements. The AO did not provide evidence of any cash payment made by the assessee to obtain the share application money.
What were the issues?
Whether the addition of share application money is justified when it has been subsequently refunded, and the genuineness of the transaction is disputed without contrary evidence from the AO.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
3 there is a merit in the submission of the assessee and thus in view of the submissions of the assessee, the delay in filing the appeal by the assessee is condoned.
1 The Bench has heard both the parties and perused the materials available on record including the order of the ld. CIT(A) and also the written submissions filed by the assesse. In this case, the Bench during the course of hearing noticed that the ld CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee on the ground that the asseessee had obtained share application money from dummy / bogus company namely M/s. Triangular Infocom Ltd. on 10-10-2009 which was managed and controlled by Shri Praveen Kumar. The contention of the assessee is that he has already returned back share application money to M/s. Triangular Infocom Ltd. on 7-03-2012 which is also evident from the bank statement at PB 30-31. On the contrary, no evidence had been brought on record by the AO that the assessee has paid any cash to M/s. Triangular Infocom Ltd. for obtaining share application money of Rs. 25.00 lacs from assessee. After having gone through the factual position as well as legal position contained in the present case, the Bench is of the view that share application money has already been refunded back by the assessee to M/s. Triangular Infocom Ltd. Thus in that eventuality and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the Bench feels that the addition sustained by the ld
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Arun Aloysius Barnes vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 14 Oct 2026
- Gr Infra Projects Limited Ratlam Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Pankaj Das vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026