SHREE ASTHAA SANSTHA,JAIPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD-1, JAIPUR
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”A” JAIPUR
Before: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM
आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”A” JAIPUR Mk0 ,l- lhrky{eh] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh jkBksM deys'k t;UrHkkbZ] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 395/JPR/2024 Shree Asthaa Sanstha cuke Exemption, 4, Durga Vihar, Sector No. 3, Malviya Vs. Ward-1, Jaipur. Nagar, Jaipur. LFkk;hys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AADTS1077L vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksjls@Assesseeby : Shri Ashok Kumar Gupta (Adv.) jktLo dh vksjls@Revenue by: Shri Arvind Kumar (CIT) lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@Date of Hearing :18/06/2024 mn?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@Date of Pronouncement :28/06/2024 vkns'k@ORDER
PER: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, J.M. This appeal is filed by the assessee aggrieved from the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income (Exemption), Jaipur [Herein after referred to as “ld.CIT(E)”] dated 24.02.2024. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:-
“1. The Impugned order u/s 12ABof the Act dated 24/02/2024 is bad in law and on facts, without providing adequate & reasonable opportunity of being heard, being without jurisdiction, barred by limitation and for various other reasons illegal, bad in law, glaring violation of natural justice and hence the same may kindly be quashed.
2 ITA No. 395/JPR/2024 Shree Asthaa Sanstha 2. The Ld. CIT(E) erred in law as well as on the facts of the case in rejecting the application for granting Registration/approval u/s 12AB. The rejection so made and refusal to grant Registration/approval u/s 12ABis contrary to the provisions of law and facts of the case. The same kindly may be quashed. 3. That the impugned order so passed was in the contravention of the law prevalent at the relevant point of time and also on fact and hence may kindly be quashed. The Id. CIT(E) may be directed to grant Registration/approval from the date of application. 4. The appellant prays your honour indulgences to add, amend or alter of or any of the grounds of the appeal on or before the date of hearing.
Brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed online application in Form No. 10AB seeking registration u/s 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was filed on 29.09.2023. In this case, the applications for registration u/s 12A was rejected as withdrawn vide this office order DIN & Notice No. ITBA/EXM/F/FXM45/2022-23/1049327905 (1) dated 01.02.2023. Aletter/notice No. ITBA/EXM/F/EXM43/2023-24/1060113316(1) dated 25.01.2024 was issued at the e-mail/address provided in the application requiring the assesseeto submit certain documents/explanations by 05.02.2024, but no compliance has been made by the assessee. Thereafter, a reminder letter was issued DIN & Notice No. ITBA/EXM/F/EXM43/2023-24/1060573483(1) dated 06.02.2024 wherein date of hearing was fixed as 09.02.2024, but again no compliance has been made the assessee. Further, again one more opportunity was also provided
3 ITA No. 395/JPR/2024 Shree Asthaa Sanstha to the applicant vide this office DIN & Notice No. ITBA/EXM/F/EXM43/2023-24/1060758512(1) dated 10.02.2024 to submit complete details/information by 15.02.2024. This time also on given date, the assessee had not produced any details/documents. Therefore, the case is decided on the basis of material filed by the assessee along with its application in Form no. 10AB.It is noted that the ld.CIT(E) rejected the assessee’s claim for registration u/s 12AB of the Act on the following grounds:- * Incomplete form 10AB * Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959. * Genuineness of activities.
Aggrieved from the order of the ld. CIT(E), the assessee preferred an appeal before us taking the ground as raised in para 2 above.
During the course of hearing, the ld. AR of the assessee submitted that assessee was not provided adequate opportunity of being heard . As the three noticed issued were with 15 days time only and thus, the principles of natural justice is violated. Thus, the assessee may be provided one more opportunity to
4 ITA No. 395/JPR/2024 Shree Asthaa Sanstha advance his arguments/submissions before the ld. CIT(E) in the interest of equity and justice.
Per contra, the ld. DR relied on the orders of the ld. CIT(E). Three opportunities were given and not complied.
After hearing both the parties and perusing the materials available on record, it is noted that the application filed by the assessee for seeking registration u/s 12AA of the Act was rejected by the ld. CIT(E) on the following grounds. Incomplete form 10AB Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959. Genuineness of activities. 8. Keeping in view the submissions of the ld. AR of the assessee that 3 notices were issued to the assesee on 25.01.2024, 06.02.2024 and 10.02.2024 within a short span of 15 days and the reason that assesee was not able to submit the relevant documentary evidences to support his claim within the short stipulated time . Hence, in this view of the matter, we restore the matter back to the file of the ld.CIT(E) to decide it afresh by providing one more opportunity of being heard to the assessee but at cost of Rs. 3000/- to be deposited in Prime Minister Relief fund. The assessee is directed to produce all the relevant papers concerning the issue in
5 ITA No. 395/JPR/2024 Shree Asthaa Sanstha question before the ld.CIT(E) along with receipt of cost. Thus the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.
Before parting, we may make it clear that our decision to restore the matter back to the file of the ld. CIT(E) shall in no way be construed as having any reflection or expression on the merits of the dispute, which shall be adjudicated by the ld. CIT(E) independently in accordance with law.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 28/06/2024.
Sd/- Sd/- ¼jkBksM deys'k t;UrHkkbZ ½ ¼MkWa-,l-lhrky{eh½ (RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI) (Dr. S. Seethalakshmi) ys[kk lnL; @Accountant Member U;kf;d lnL;@Judicial Member Tk;iqj@Jaipur fnukad@Dated:- 28/06/2024 *Santosh आदेश की प्रतिलिपिअग्रेf’ात@ब्वचल वf जीम वतकमत वितूंतकमक जवरू 1. The Appellant- Shree Asthaa Sanstha, Jaipur 2. izR;FkhZ@ The Respondent- Exemption, Ward-1, Jaipur. 3. vk;djvk;qDr@ The ld CIT 4. vk;dj vk;qDr¼vihy½@The ld CIT(A) 5. विभागीय प्रतिनिधि] आयकरअपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर@क्त्ए प्ज्Aज्ए Jंपचनत 6. xkMZQkbZy@ Guard File (ITA No. 395/JPR/2024) vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order,
सहायक पंजीकार@Aेेजज. त्महपेजतंत
