MAHESHWARI MAHILA SANGHATHAN ,BANGALORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME (EXEMPTIONS) , BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted the assessee's nonchalant attitude in not submitting documents timely. However, in the interest of justice and equity, it was deemed appropriate to provide the assessee one more opportunity to represent its case.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a Trust incorporated on 12.01.2023, was denied registration under section 12AB of the Act because it had not commenced activities towards its objects. Despite a show cause notice, the assessee failed to submit required documents, leading to the rejection of its application by the CIT(E).
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) was justified in rejecting the registration application without allowing sufficient opportunity for the assessee to submit documents.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K & SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU
Per George George K, Vice President:
This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against CIT(E)’s order dated 04.12.2023.
Brief facts of the case are as follows:
The assessee is a Trust incorporated on 12.01.2023. The assessee was denied registration under section12AB of the Act for the reason that assessee had not commenced its activities towards the attainment of the objects of the Trust. The AO had called upon the assessee to submit note on charitable activities undertaken along with supporting documentary proof and also the financial statements since the inception of the Trust. Since, assessee had not submitted the details called for, a show cause notice dated 23.11.2023 was issued. In response to the show cause notice, learned AR appeared and submitted the financial statements for the Assessment Year 2023-24 along with provisional financials for the current year and bank account statement. From the financial statements submitted, the CIT(E) observed that assessee had not commenced its activities towards the attainment of the objects of the Trust. Hence, the CIT(E) rejected the application in Form No.10AB filed for registration under section 12AB of the Act. The learned AR submitted that before submitting the copies of invoices of bags, tiffin box and donation receipt letters from Vijay Foundation for having received yoga mats and tiffin boxes, to the CIT(E), the CIT(E) had passed the impugned order. It was submitted that in the interest of justice and equity, one more opportunity may be provided to the assessee to represent its case before the CIT(E).
The learned DR supported the orders of the AO and CIT(E).
We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. The Office of the CIT(E) had issued a show cause notice dated 23.11.2023 to file the written submissions. Since no documents were submitted in support of assessee’s claim, the CIT(E) passed an order rejecting the registration under section 12AB of the Act by observing that assessee had not commenced its activities towards the attainment of the objects of the Trust. It is the claim of the assessee that before the required documents were furnished, the CIT(E) had passed the impugned order denying registration under section 12AB of the Act. We strongly deprecate the nonchalant attitude of the assessee in not submitting the documents in time. In the interest of justice and equity, we are of the view that assessee ought to be provided with one more opportunity to represent its case and accordingly the issues are restored to the files of the CIT(E). The assessee is directed to co-operate with the Revenue and shall not seek unnecessary adjournment. It is ordered accordingly.
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026