ACIT, CIRCLE-7(1), DELHI, DELHI vs. DEWAN SUGARS LIMITED, UTTAR PRADESH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the amount written off on account of OTS of term loans qualifies as a business deduction in the relevant financial year. The CIT(A)'s order was upheld, with directions for the AO to conduct specific verifications.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed a deduction for an amount written off on account of a One Time Settlement (OTS) of term loans. The CPC disallowed this amount under Section 43B, stating it was not an actual payment. The CIT(A) deleted the addition, and the Revenue appealed this decision.
What were the issues?
Whether an amount written off on account of a One Time Settlement of term loans is eligible for deduction under Section 43B of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘E’, NEW DELHI
Before: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. Manish Agarwal
Per Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member:
This Revenue’s appeal for Assessment Year 2023-24, arises against the Addl./JCIT(A)-6, Chennai’s DIN & order No. ITBA/APL/S/250/2024-25/1074089550(1) dated 06.03.2025, in proceedings u/s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. Heard both the parties at length. Case file perused.
This Revenue’s appeal raises the following substantive grounds:
“1. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the ld. CIT(A) has erred in allowing the appeals of the assessee by deleting the addition made by the CPC amounting to Rs.68,83,13,581/- on account of disallowance u/s 43B of the Act in any proceeding previous year but allowable during the previous year?”
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 43B
- Vco Consulatatns and Sevices Private… vs ITO, Corporate Ward 3(3), ChennaiITA 2145/CHNY/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Siemens Gamesa Renewable Power Private… vs The Dy CIT Circle 8(2)(1), MumbaiITA 8020/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Amritvarsha Industries Limited, Ambedkar… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 6481/DEL/2026[2010-2011]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2010-2011
- Karaj Singh, Haryana vs PCIT (Central) Gurgaon, GurgaonITA 642/CHANDI/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- ACIT, Mumbai vs Imp Powers Limited, MumbaiITA 4982/MUM/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026