M/S. SAVANOOR PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD,PUTTUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PANAJI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee sought to withdraw the appeal, stating that the CIT(A) had already allowed their claim for deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act, making the present appeal infructuous. The assessee was granted permission to withdraw the appeal with liberty to revive it in case the CIT(A)'s order is reversed.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the Pr.CIT dated 15/09/2023 for AY 2016-17. At the time of hearing, the assessee requested to withdraw the appeal with liberty to revive it if the CIT(A) order is overturned. The assessee's counsel submitted that the CIT(A) had allowed the appeal against the order u/s 143(3)/263 of the Act.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed against the order u/s 263 of the Act is to be dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to revive.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SMT. BEENA PILLAI & SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU
O R D E R Per Laxmi Prasad Sahu, Accountant Member :-
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order passed by the Pr.CIT, Panaji dated 15/09/2023 for the assessment year 2016-17.
At the time of hearing, it is seen from the record that the assessee vide letter dated 04th April, 2024 has Page 2 of 6 requested for the withdrawal of the appeal with the liberty to revive this appeal to agitate validity of the sec. 263 of the Act in the event, if the CIT(A) order is overturned or reversed by this Tribunal or any other statutory appellate forum. The letter dated 04/04/024 is reproduced below for ready reference:-
At the outset of hearing, the ld.AR of the assessee submitted that the CIT(A) has allowed the appeal of the assessee filed against order u/s 143(3)/263 of the Act. Hence, the appeal filed before the ITAT against the order u/s 263 of the Act dated 15/09/2023 becomes
Page 6 of 6 infructuous. In view of the same, the assessee’s appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in above terms.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Sukant Kumar vs. Union Of INDIA And 6 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026