RAJENDRA AND URSULA JOSHI CHARITABLE TRUST,JAIPUR vs. ITO EXEMPTION, WARD-1, JAIPUR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 109/JPR/2024Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur24 July 2024Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE (Accountant Member)1 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Bench noted that the reason provided for the delay in filing the appeal, which involved legal advice and technical glitches, lacked merit and was dismissed. Subsequently, the assessee's authorized representative applied for the withdrawal of the appeal, to which the DR had no objection.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the Ld. CIT(E) dated 27.02.2023 passed under section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeal was filed with a delay of 283 days.

What were the issues?

Whether the delay in filing the appeal is condonable and whether the appeal can be withdrawn.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80G

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B” JAIPUR

Before: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 109/JPR/2024

Hearing: 23/07/2024Pronounced: 24/07/2024

vkns'k@ORDER PER: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, J.M.

This is an appeal filed by the assessee against orders of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Jaipur [herein after referred to as “Ld.CIT(E)] dated 27.02.2023 passed under section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

2 Rajendra and Ursula Joshi Charitable Trust 2.1 At the outset of hearing, the Bench observed that there is delay of 283 days in filing of the appeal by the assessee for which the ld. AR of the assessee filed an affidavit giving the following reason for such delay:-

“7. That the delay in filing appeal before Hon’ble ITAT, jaipur Bench was due to time taken in process of legal advise taken for re-apply & technical glitches on the Income Tax Portal and the same is considered as reasonable cause for delay in appeal filing before Hon’ble ITAT, jaipur bench.”

2.2 The Bench noted that the submission as raised by the assessee in its affidavit has no merit and the same is dismissed. 3. As regards the appeal of the assessee, the Bench noted that Ld. AR of the assessee vide his application dated 23.07.2024 prayed for withdrawal of the appeal for which ld. DR has not objection. Hence, the Bench allow the assessee to withdraw the appeal. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn as pronounced in the open court on 24/07/2024.

More judgments on Section 80G

All 6,482 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80G →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →