RAJENDRA AND URSULA JOSHI CHARITABLE TRUST,JAIPUR vs. ITO EXEMPTION, WARD-1, JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Bench noted that the reason provided for the delay in filing the appeal, which involved legal advice and technical glitches, lacked merit and was dismissed. Subsequently, the assessee's authorized representative applied for the withdrawal of the appeal, to which the DR had no objection.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the Ld. CIT(E) dated 27.02.2023 passed under section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeal was filed with a delay of 283 days.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal is condonable and whether the appeal can be withdrawn.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B” JAIPUR
Before: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 109/JPR/2024
vkns'k@ORDER PER: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, J.M.
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against orders of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Jaipur [herein after referred to as “Ld.CIT(E)] dated 27.02.2023 passed under section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2 Rajendra and Ursula Joshi Charitable Trust 2.1 At the outset of hearing, the Bench observed that there is delay of 283 days in filing of the appeal by the assessee for which the ld. AR of the assessee filed an affidavit giving the following reason for such delay:-
“7. That the delay in filing appeal before Hon’ble ITAT, jaipur Bench was due to time taken in process of legal advise taken for re-apply & technical glitches on the Income Tax Portal and the same is considered as reasonable cause for delay in appeal filing before Hon’ble ITAT, jaipur bench.”
2.2 The Bench noted that the submission as raised by the assessee in its affidavit has no merit and the same is dismissed. 3. As regards the appeal of the assessee, the Bench noted that Ld. AR of the assessee vide his application dated 23.07.2024 prayed for withdrawal of the appeal for which ld. DR has not objection. Hence, the Bench allow the assessee to withdraw the appeal. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn as pronounced in the open court on 24/07/2024.
More judgments on Section 80G
- Savan Dayalal Ladani, Rajkot vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-2(1)…ITA 575/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pareshbhai Savjibhai Khunt, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward - 2(2)(3), RajkotITA 842/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- Kundan Patel vs. State Bank Of INDIAMadhya Pradesh · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Pacific Export vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Kashiram Fuels Lole Propritorship Firm Through Proprietor Swati vs. Bank Of INDIAMadhya Pradesh · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026