Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Before: SHRI G.D. AGRAWALG.D. AGRAWAL & AND BEFORE SHRI G.D. AGRAWALG.D. AGRAWAL & AND SMT. BEENA A. PILLAI MT. BEENA A. PILLAI
PER G.D. AGRAWAL, VP PER G.D. AGRAWAL, VP :- PER G.D. AGRAWAL, VP PER G.D. AGRAWAL, VP This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2008-09 is directed against the order of learned CIT(A)-XXVII, New Delhi dated 28th January, 2013.
At the time of hearing before us, neither anybody appeared on behalf of the assessee nor there was any request for adjournment. On several occasions in the past i.e., on 01.01.2014, 15.04.2015, 27.01.2016 and 05.04.2016, the matter was adjourned at the written request of the assessee.
In view of the above, we are of the opinion that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting this appeal. While taking this view, we derive support from the decision of Delhi Bench of ITAT in the case of 2 ITA-4197/Del/2013 CIT vs. Multiplan India (P.) Ltd. – [1991] 38 ITD 320 (Delhi). Accordingly, we dismiss the assessee’s appeal in limine.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed in limine. Decision pronounced in the open Court on 05.07.2016.