Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK
Before: S/SHRI N.S SAINI & PAVAN KUMAR GADALE
1 ITA Nos. 63,64,65, 66 & 67/CT K/ 2016 Asse ssment Years: 2 00 3-0 4, 20 04- 05, 200 5-0 6, 2006 -07 & 20 07- 08
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK
BEFORE S/SHRI N.S SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICIAL MEMBER
ITA Nos. 63,64,65,66 & 67/CTK/2016 Assessment Years: 2003-04, 2004-05, 2005-06, 2006-07 & 2007-08
Swasthya Bikash Samiti, Vs. ACIT, Circle 2(1), Cuttack SCB Medical College and Hospital Compound, Mangalabag, Cuttack PAN/GIR No.AAEAS 5600 H (Appellant) .. ( Respondent)
Assessee by : Shri Sandeep Kumar Jena, AR Revenue by : Shri D.K.Pradhan, DR
Date of Hearing : 24/10/ 2017 Date of Pronouncement : 25/10/ 2017
O R D E R Per Bench:
These are appeals filed by the assessee against the consolidated
order of the CIT(A)- Cuttack dated 20.11.2015 for the assessment years
2003-04 to 2007-08, respectively.
The common grounds of appeal taken in all the appeals read as
under:
”. A. For that the Ld AO as well as Ld. CIT (A) are erred in facts as well as in law in determining the status of the appellant as AOP by completely ignoring the Memorandum and Govt's Notifications of the appellant's creation and existence, where as it has been clearly stated that the appellant has been
2 ITA Nos. 63,64,65, 66 & 67/CT K/ 2016 Asse ssment Years: 2 00 3-0 4, 20 04- 05, 200 5-0 6, 2006 -07 & 20 07- 08 created by the Govt of Odisha to provide Health services to the people of the state as an agent/ intermediately. B. For that the User fees so collected by the appellant has been determined/decided by the Health and Family Welfare Department of Govt, of Odisha and the appellant as duty bound to obey the instructions of the Govt, as an agent to collect the same on its behalf from various departments of SCB Medical College.
C. That The Ld CIT (A), Cuttack has dismissed the appeal without considering the facts and documents in a narrow premise by holding that as the Appellant could not produce the certificate of registration u/s 12 A of the Income Tax Act,1961, therefore exemption u/s 11 and 12 shall not be allowed. The Ld CIT (A), Cuttack completely failed to decide the status of the Appellant which is part and parcel of Govt Hospital.”
At the time of hearing, ld A.R. of the assessee filed before us a copy
of order dated 11.4.2012 of this Bench of the Tribunal in the case of the
assessee itself passed for the assessment years 2003-04 to 2007-08 in
ITA No.466/CTK2011 and ITA Nos.467 to 470/CTK/2011 and others and
submitted that the Tribunal had set aside the assessment in all the years
under appeal to the file of the Assessing Officer for making denovo
assessment with the following terms:
“We are of the considered view that all these assessments are just “to be restored to the file of the AO for denovo assessment as non-registration to the assessee u/s.12AA is the only basis for not accepting the exemptions claimed by the assessee in its returns. Therefore, we are of the considered /view that all these assessments are just to be restored to the file of the AO for de novo consideration after the CIT has passed the order afresh on the assessee filing fresh application u/s.l2AA for registration in accordance with the provisions of law and after the said order reaching a finality.”
Ld A.R. of the assessee submitted that the Assessing Officer has
passed the assessment orders in pursuance to the direction of the
Tribunal afresh without waiting for the order of the CIT on the application
3 ITA Nos. 63,64,65, 66 & 67/CT K/ 2016 Asse ssment Years: 2 00 3-0 4, 20 04- 05, 200 5-0 6, 2006 -07 & 20 07- 08 for registration filed by the assessee u/s.12AA of the Act and in these
assessments, the Assessing Officer has disallowed the claim of exemption
u/s.11 and 12 of the Act to the assessee. He submitted that the hearing
by the CIT for grant of registration u/s.12AA of the Act has been
concluded on 6.7.2017 for which the order is still awaited. It was his
submission that not following the order of the Tribunal by the Assessing
Officer while making the assessment denovo and disallowing the claim for
exemption u/s.11 & 12 of the Act makes the order of the Assessing
Officer bad in law.
On the other hand, ld D.R. submitted that as the assessment was
getting time barred, the Assessing Officer had no option but to pass the
assessment orders in pursuance to the direction of the Tribunal.
After considering the rival submissions and perusing the materials
available on record, we find that the hearing for grant of registration
u/s.12AA of the Act has been concluded by the CIT on 6.7.2017, for which
the order is yet to be passed by him. In the above background of the
case, we set aside the orders of the CIT(A) and remand the appeals back
to the file of the Assessing Officer for making the assessment denovo with
the same direction as given by the Tribunal in its order dated 11.4.2012.
Thus, the appeals of the assessee allowed for statistical purposes.
4 ITA Nos. 63,64,65, 66 & 67/CT K/ 2016 Asse ssment Years: 2 00 3-0 4, 20 04- 05, 200 5-0 6, 2006 -07 & 20 07- 08 7. In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical
purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 25 /10/2017. Sd/- sd/- (Pavan Kumar Gadale) (N.S Saini) JUDICIALMEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Cuttack; Dated 25 /10/2017 B.K.Parida, SPS Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. The Appellant : Swasthya Bikash Samiti, SCB Medical College and Hospital Compound, Mangalabag, Cuttack 2. The Respondent. ACIT, Circle 2(1), Cuttack 3. The CIT(A)- Cuttack 4. Pr.CIT- Cuttack 5. DR, ITAT, Cuttack BY ORDER, 6. Guard file. //True Copy// SR.PRIVATE SECRETARY ITAT, Cuttack