PRAVEEN KUMAR KATIYAR,FARRUKHABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 4(2)(1), FARRUKHABAD, FARRUKHABAD
Facts
The assessee filed an appeal against an order dated 10.10.2023, but with a delay of 459 days. The delay occurred because the notices and the impugned order from the CIT(Appeals) were sent to a wrong email address and were never served physically or via email. The assessee became aware of the ex parte order only when a penalty notice was received.
Held
The Tribunal condoned the delay of 459 days, finding sufficient cause due to the non-service of notices. The Tribunal decided to remit the matter back to the CIT(Appeals) for a fresh adjudication on merits, emphasizing the need to provide the assessee with an opportunity to be heard and to adhere to principles of natural justice.
Key Issues
Whether the delay in filing the appeal can be condoned due to non-service of notices, and whether the matter should be remanded for fresh adjudication.
Sections Cited
271AAC(1), 250
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AGRA BENCH, AGRA
Before: SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AGRA BENCH, AGRA BEFORE : SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MANISH AGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 141/Agr/2025 Assessment Year: 2017-18
Mr. Praveen Kumar Katiyar, Vs. ACIT, Circle 4(2)(1), 23-24, Satanpur Mandi, Gunjan Farrukhabad. Vihar, Fatehgarh, Farrukhabad- 209601 (UP). PAN : AATPK4852H (Appellant) (Respondent)
Assessee by Sh. Nitin Goyal, Advocate & Sh. Amit Goyal, Advocate Department by Sh. Shailendra Srivastava, Sr. DR Date of hearing 22.05.2025 Date of pronouncement 16.06.2025 ORDER PER : SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This appeal has been preferred by assessee against the impugned order dated 10.10.2023 passed in Appeal No. CIT (A) Aligarh/10450/2019-20 by the Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), NFAC, Delhi u/s. 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) for the assessment year 2017-18, wherein the ld. CIT(Appeals) has dismissed first appeal of the assessee. 2. At the very outset, learned representative for the assessee has submitted that this appeal was filed on 13.03.2025 against the impugned
ITA No.141/Agr/2025
order dated 10.10.2023 by a delay of 459 days. Ld. AR has drawn the
attention of the Tribunal towards assessee’s delay condonation
application and submitted that the notices and the impugned order
passed by the ld. CIT(Appeals) were sent on wrong e-mail address and the same were never served either physically upon the assessee or
through the email of the assessee despite the address and email ID of
the assessee was properly mentioned in Form-35. Hence, the appellant/assessee was not aware of passing the impugned order. It was only on 7th March, 2025, when a notice for penalty u/s. 271AAC(1) dated
27.02.2025 was received by appellant/assessee physically, he came to know about passing of the ex parte impugned order and took immediate steps to file the appeal. The appellant/assessee has also filed an affidavit
in support of these facts mentioned in the delay condonation application. Keeping in view the un-controverted facts deposed in the affidavit, there seems sufficient cause to condone the delay. The said delay is
accordingly condoned. 3. Learned AR has further submitted that for want of proper opportunities, the assessee could not file his submissions before the ld.
CIT(Appeals), who was also not justified in dismissing assessee’s appeal merely by endorsing the assessment order simpliciter. Prayed to set
2 | P a g e
ITA No.141/Agr/2025
aside the impugned order and to provide opportunity of hearing before
Ld. CIT(Appeals).
Learned DR, on the other hand, has submitted that the assessee
was provided sufficient opportunity of hearing by learned CIT(Appeals)
on various occasions, but for no avail. Learned DR has supported the
impugned order.
It transpires from the perusal of record that the assessee failed to
respond to the notices issued by the first appellate authority on
23.01.2021, 25.08.2021 and 27.09.2023. Such an irresponsive conduct
of the assessee cannot be appreciated. However, in the interest of justice
and fair play, we deem it just and appropriate to afford last opportunity to
the assessee and remit the matter back to the file of learned
CIT(Appeals) for adjudication of the matter afresh on merits. We order
accordingly. We further direct the assessee to be diligent and
cooperative in attending the hearings and making submissions before the
learned CIT(Appeals) for the expeditious and effective disposal.
Assessee shall refrain from seeking any adjournment but for compelling
and unavoidable reasons. Needless to say that learned CIT(Appeals)
shall ensure the observance of the principles of natural justice. The
appeal is liable to be allowed accordingly.
3 | P a g e
ITA No.141/Agr/2025
In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes. The
impugned order dated 10.10.2023 is set aside.
Order pronounced in the open court on 16.06.2025.
Sd/- Sd/- (MANISH AGARWAL) (SUNIL KUMAR SINGH) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 16.06.2025 *aks/- Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR Asst. Registrar, ITAT, Agra
4 | P a g e
