ABDUL WAHB,JAIPUR vs. ITO WARD 5(1), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

PDF
ITA 865/JPR/2024Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur20 August 2024AY 2017-18Bench: the Bench, there is no written submission or any documentary evidence countering the order of the ld.CIT(A) has been filed by the ld. AR of the assesse. Hence, in this situation, the Bench has no other option except to confirm the order of the ld.CIT(A). Thus the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. 3.0 In the result, the appeal of the assesee is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on 20/08/2024. जयपुर / Jaipur दिनांक/Dated:- *Mishra 20/08/2024 Sd/- (Sandeep Gosain) न्यायिक सदस्य/1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Facts

The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for the assessment year 2017-18. During the hearing, the assessee's AR sought adjournment via email but did not provide a specific reason. The adjournment application was rejected.

Held

The Tribunal noted that the CIT(A) had partly allowed the appeal. However, the assessee did not file any written submissions or documentary evidence countering the CIT(A)'s order. Therefore, the Tribunal had no option but to confirm the order of the CIT(A).

Key Issues

Whether the appeal of the assessee should be dismissed due to the absence of specific reasons for adjournment and lack of counter-evidence against the CIT(A)'s order.

Sections Cited

Income Tax Act

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES, ‘’SMC” JAIPUR

Before: Hon’ble SHRI SANDEEP GOSAINvk;dj vihy la-@ITA No.865/JP/2024

Hearing: 23/07/2024Pronounced: 20/08/2024

PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against order of the ld. CIT(A) dated 30-04-2024, National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [ hereinafter referred to as (NFAC) ] for the assessment year 2017-18 raising grounds of appeal at Form No. 36. 2.1 During the course of hearing, it is noticed that none appeared on behalf of the assessee except filing an adjournment application on behalf of the ld. AR of the assessee through E-Mail expressing his inability to attend the case on the date of hearing. The Bench took into consideration the adjournment application but found

2 Order pronounced in the open court on 20 /08/2024. (Sandeep Gosain) U;kf;d lnL;@Judicial Member Tk;iqj@Jaipur fnukad@Dated:- 20 /08/2024 *Mishra आदेश की प्रतिलिपि अग्रेf’ात@ब्वचल वf जीम वतकमत वितूंतकमक जवरू

1.

The Appellant- Shri Abdul Wahb, Jaipur 2. izR;FkhZ@ The Respondent- The ITO , Ward 5 (1), Jaipur 3. vk;dj vk;qDr@ The ld CIT 4. vk;dj vk;qDr¼vihy½@The ld CIT(A) 5. विभागीय प्रतिनिधि] आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर@क्त्ए प्ज्Aज्ए Jंपचनत 6. xkMZ QkbZy@ Guard File (ITA No. 865/JP/2024) vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order, सहायक पंजीकार@Aेेजज. त्महपेजतंत

ABDUL WAHB,JAIPUR vs ITO WARD 5(1), JAIPUR, JAIPUR | BharatTax