M/S. OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY OF INDIA KARNATAKA ,BANGALORE vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), , BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the delay in filing was condoned by CBDT Circular No. 7/2024, which extended the due date for filing Form 10AB. Therefore, the issue was remitted back to the CIT(Exemptions) for fresh consideration.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an application for approval under Section 80G in Form 10AB belatedly. The CIT(Exemptions) rejected the application due to this delay.
What were the issues?
Whether a belated application for approval under Section 80G can be considered in light of subsequent CBDT circulars extending the due date.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, C BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI & SHRI SOUNDARARAJAN K.
PER CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of CIT(Exemptions) Bangalore dated 20.3.2024, wherein he rejected the application filed in form 10AB dated 28.9.2023 on the reason that it has been belatedly filed by the assessee.
Facts of the case are that the assessee filed Form 10AB dated 28.9.2023 for approval u/s 80G of the Act. The assessee originally obtained approval u/s 80G of the Act in Form 10AC dated 9.7.2021 (provisionally from assessment year 2021-22 to 2023-24). For regulation of provisional approval obtained u/s 80G of the Act, assessee filed application in form 10AB filed on 28.9.2023 i.e. after the expiry of the provisional approval period and also application is filed u/s 80G(5) (ii) of the Act. As per provision to section 80G(5) of M/s. Operational Research Society of India Karnataka, Bangalore Page 2 of 3 the Act, the institution was to make an application for grant of approval under clause (iii) where the institution or fund has been provisionally approved atleast 6 months prior to expiry of period of provisional approval or within 6 months of this commencement of its activities, whichever is earlier. According to this section, assessee ought to have been made application on or before 30.9.2022. However, the application in the present case was made on 28.9.2023 which is belated. Accordingly, CIT (Exemptions) rejected the approval sought for u/s 80G of the Act. Against this assessee is in appeal before us.
We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. The ld. A.R. submitted that there was a delay in filing the application for approval u/s 80G of the Act. However, that delay was condoned by CBDT vide Circular No.7/2024 dated 25.4.2024, which is reproduced below:
More judgments on Section 80G
- Savan Dayalal Ladani, Rajkot vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-2(1)…ITA 575/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pareshbhai Savjibhai Khunt, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward - 2(2)(3), RajkotITA 842/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026