SRI. RAMA CHARITABLE TRUST ,BANGALORE vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), BANGALORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 883/BANG/2024Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore10 June 2024Bench: SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI (Accountant Member), SHRI KESHAV DUBEY (Judicial Member)1 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The tribunal noted that although there was a delay, it was condoned by the CBDT vide Circular No.7/2024. The tribunal remitted the issue to the CIT(Exemptions) for fresh consideration in light of the circular.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an application for approval under sections 12A and 80G of the Income Tax Act belatedly. The NFAC rejected the application for not condoning the delay, as it was filed after the stipulated period.

What were the issues?

Whether the delay in filing the application for approval under sections 12A and 80G was liable to be condoned in view of the CBDT circular?

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12A,Section 80G,Section 10(23C),Section 35

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C’’ BENCH: BANGALORE

Before: SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI & SHRI KESHAV DUBEY

For Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, D.R
Hearing: 10.06.2024Pronounced: 10.06.2024

PER CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:

1.

These two appeals by assessee are directed against two different orders of NFAC both are dated 2.4.2024.

2.

In these appeals, the NFAC has not condoned the delay in filing the Form No.10AB dated 30.10.2023 for granting approval u/s 12A & 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “The Act”) on the reason that said application for approval ought to have been filed by the assessee atleast 6 months prior to expiry of the period of the provisional approval or within 6 months of commencement of its activity, which is earlier. However, in this case, the assessee filed belatedly before ld. CIT(Exemptions), Bangalore. In this case, it was noted by the ld. CIT(Exemptions) that assessee ought to have been filed the application by 30.9.2023. The application was made on & 884/Bang/2024 Sri Rama Charitable Trust, Bangalore Page 2 of 3 30.10.2023. Hence, it was dismissed. Against this assessee is in appeal before us. 3. After hearing both the parties, we are of the opinion that there was a delay in filing the application for approval u/s 12A/80G of the Act. However, that delay was condoned by CBDT vide Circular No.7/2024 dated 25.4.2024, which is reproduced below:

3.1 Being so, it is appropriate to remit this issue to the file of CIT(Exemptions) to consider the above Circular. In view of this, we remit the entire issue in dispute to the file of ld. CIT (Exemptions) for fresh consideration to decide the same in accordance with law. & 884/Bang/2024 Sri Rama Charitable Trust, Bangalore Page 3 of 3 4. In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open court on 10th June, 2024

More judgments on Section 12A

All 6,064 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →