SURESH KUMAR VENKATESH ,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(2)(1), BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found the assessee's reason for the delay to be reasonable and bonafide. Consequently, the delay of 102 days in filing the appeal before the NFAC was condoned. The Tribunal also decided to remit the issue regarding the addition made by the AO back to the NFAC for fresh consideration.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the NFAC belatedly with a delay of 102 days. The reason for the delay was the pending confirmation letter from S. Hanumesh regarding an advance payment. The assessee's representative submitted this explanation for the delay.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay of 102 days in filing the appeal before NFAC can be condoned? Whether the issue regarding addition made by AO should be remitted to NFAC for fresh decision?
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C’’ BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI & SHRI KESHAV DUBEY
PER KESHAV DUBERY, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal by assessee is directed against the order of NFAC for the assessment year 2017-18 dated 19.2.2024 passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “The Act”).
The assessee is in appeal before us for disposing the appeal of the assessee in limine by not condoning the delay of 102 days filed before NFAC belatedly. Ld. A.R. submitted that there was a delay of 102 days in filing the appeal before NFAC as the assessee was waiting to receive a confirmation letter from S. Hanumesh who has made impugned advance money to the assessee so as to deposit the same into assessee’s Axis Bank account No.91302002925. According to the assessee, a delay in receipt of confirmation from the person who has advanced money to the assessee. Hence, assessee has been Suresh Kumar Venkatesh, Bangalore Page 2 of 2 waiting to file appeal before NFAC after getting confirmation from S. Hanumesh.
We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. We find that the reason advanced by the assessee for delay in filing the appeal before NFAC is reasonable and bonafide. Accordingly, we condone the delay of 102 days in filing the appeal before NFAC and thereafter in the interest of justice, we remit the issue in dispute with regard to addition made by ld. AO to the file of NFAC for deciding it afresh after going through the evidence to be produced by the assessee before NFAC. Ordered accordingly.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 6th June, 2024
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026