ACIT, AGRA vs. MEERA AGRAWAL, MATHURA
Facts
The Revenue preferred these appeals against the order of the CIT(A) who had set aside the assessment orders for AY 2017-18 and 2019-20 and remanded them back to the Assessing Officer for fresh assessment.
Held
The CIT(A) had found that the assessee was not afforded a reasonable opportunity of hearing during the assessment proceedings, violating the principles of natural justice.
Key Issues
Whether the CIT(Appeals) is empowered to remand the matter back to the Assessing Officer when the assessment order was passed under section 144 of the Act, especially after a recent amendment to section 251.
Sections Cited
250(6), 251, 144, 153A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AGRA BENCH, AGRA
Before: SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH & SHRI BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AGRA BENCH, AGRA BEFORE : SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.42 & 43/Agr/2025 Assessment Year: 2017-18 & 2019-20
ACIT, Central Circle, Vs. Meera Agrawal, 22, Jagannath Agra. Puri, Mathura (UP) PAN : ADMPA9962C (Appellant) (Respondent)
Assessee by Sh. Anurag Sinha, Advocate Department by Sh. Sukesh Kumar Jain, CIT/DR
Date of hearing 17.07.2025 Date of pronouncement 30.07.2025
ORDER PER: SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
These appeals have been preferred by Revenue against the impugned orders both dated 18.11.2024 passed in Appeal no. CIT(A)- IV/KNP/11934/2016-17 and CIT(A)-IV/KNP/11173/2018-19 by the Ld.
Commissioner of Income– tax(Appeals)-4, Kanpur [hereinafter referred to as the “CIT(A)”] u/s. 250(6) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as "Act"] for the Assessment Years [A.Y.] 2017-18 and 2019-20, wherein learned CIT(A) after resorting to the recent amendment inserted by Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024 w.e.f. 01.10.2024 in section 251, has set aside the
ITA No. 42 & 43/Agr/2025
assessment orders dated 28.06.2021 and 30.07.2021 and referred the cases
back to the Assessing Officer for making a fresh assessment orders after
providing reasonable opportunity to the assessee in accordance with the
principles of natural justice.
Revenue has preferred these appeals against the assessee on the
ground that ld. CIT(Appeals) has erred in setting aside the assessment
orders and referring the cases back to the Assessing Officer for fresh
assessment, ignoring the fact that the assessee had been provided sufficient
opportunities of hearing by the Assessing Officer. Revenue has further
mentioned that the failure on the part of the assessee in responding to the
statutory notices without any reasonable ground has resulted in passing
such assessment orders u/s. 144 of the Act.
We have perused the records and heard the ld. Departmental
Representative for the Revenue and ld. Authorized Representative for the
assessee.
The small issue involved in these appeals is as to whether ld.
CIT(Appeals) is empowered to remand the matter back to the Assessing
Officer in a case when the assessment order is passed u/s. 144 of the Act.
Ld. DR has not disputed that the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024 has empowered
ld. CIT(Appeals) w.e.f. from the said amendment, i.e., from 01.10.2024 that 2 | P a g e
ITA No. 42 & 43/Agr/2025
the first appellate authority may set aside the assessment order and is also
empowered to refer the case back to the Assessing Officer for making fresh
assessment in case of an appeal against the order of assessment passed
u/s. 144 of the Act. It is also not disputed that the said assessment orders
have been passed u/s. 144 read with section 153A of the Act. A perusal of
the impugned orders reveal that the ld. CIT(Appeals) has categorically found
that the assessee was not afforded reasonable opportunity of hearing in the
assessment proceedings. We, therefore, do not deem it just and proper to
interfere in the wisdom of ld. CIT(Appeals) in referring the case to the
Assessing Officer back, more so when the first appellat authority has made
such orders after concluding that the principles of natural justice have not
been complied with. The said issue is accordingly decided against the
appellant/Revenue.
In the result, Revenue’s both the appeals are dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 30.07.2025.
Sd/- Sd/- (BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH) (SUNIL KUMAR SINGH) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 30.07.2025. *aks/- Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR Asst. Registrar, ITAT, Agra
3 | P a g e
