ASHOK KUMAR GOYAL,GWALIOR vs. DCIT/ACIT 1(1), GWALIOR

PDF
ITA 268/AGR/2025Status: DisposedITAT Agra30 July 2025AY 2013-14Bench: SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH (Judicial Member), SHRI BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH (Accountant Member)1 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Facts

The assessee's appeal was against the order of the CIT(Appeals) which confirmed an addition of Rs.1,23,10,312/-. The assessee had claimed this amount as short-term capital gains, but it was treated as income from other sources. The assessee did not appear before the CIT(Appeals) despite notices.

Held

The Tribunal noted that the CIT(Appeals) passed an ex-parte order without discussing the merits of the case, which violates Section 250(6) of the Act and principles of natural justice. The Tribunal decided to provide a last opportunity to the assessee.

Key Issues

Whether the CIT(Appeals) erred in confirming the assessment order without proper adjudication and in violation of natural justice, despite the assessee's non-appearance.

Sections Cited

250(6), 147, 144B

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AGRA BENCH, AGRA

Before: SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH & SHRI BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH

Hearing: 16.07.2025Pronounced: 30.07.2025

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AGRA BENCH, AGRA BEFORE : SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 268/Agr/2025 Assessment Year: 2013-14

Ashok Kumar Goyal, Prop., Vs. JCIT/Addl. CIT, C/o Hariom Land Trading Co., NFAC, Delhi. Khatke Ka Bada, Dal Bazar, Lashkar, Gwalior. PAN : ACLPG9004H (Appellant) (Respondent)

Assessee by None (Adjournment application rejected) Department by Sh. Anil Kumar, Sr. DR

Date of hearing 16.07.2025 Date of pronouncement 30.07.2025

ORDER PER : SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This appeal has been preferred by assessee against the impugned order dated 25.03.2025 passed in Appeal No. NFAC/2012-13/10112174 by

Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), NFAC, Delhi u/s. 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) for the assessment year 2013-14, wherein learned CIT(Appeals) has dismissed

assessee’s first appeal, confirming the addition of Rs.1,23,10,312/- treating the same to be an income from other sources instead of short-term capital

ITA No.268Agr/2025

gains claimed by the assessee, vide assessment order dated 31.03.2022

passed u/s. 147 r.w.s. 144B of the Act.

2.

This appeal has been preferred on the ground, in addition to other

grounds, that the ld. CIT(Appeals) has erred in confirming the assessment

order in violation of section 250(6) of the Act and the principles of natural

justice.

3.

None appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, an adjournment

application was placed on record, which was rejected. We have perused

the records and heard the learned Departmental Representative for the

Revenue who supported the impugned order.

4.

It transpires from the perusal of the impugned order that the assessee

did not respond to the notices issued by the first appellate authority on

20.08.2024, 27.08.2024 and 19.12.2024. Such a conduct of assessee

cannot be appreciated. It is, however, noticed that learned CIT(Appeals)

passed ex-parte impugned order without any discussion on the merits of

the case, whereas learned CIT(Appeals) was expected to state the points

for determination, decision thereon and the reasons for the decision as

provided u/s. 250(6) of the Act. In the circumstances and in the interest of

justice and fair play, we deem it just and appropriate to afford last

opportunity to the assessee and remit the matter back to the file of learned

CIT(Appeals) for adjudication on merits. We order accordingly. We further 2 | P a g e

ITA No.268Agr/2025

direct the assessee to be diligent and cooperative in attending the hearings

and making submissions before the learned CIT(Appeals) for the

expeditious and effective disposal. Assessee shall refrain from seeking any

adjournment but for compelling and unavoidable reasons. Needless to say

that learned CIT(Appeals) shall ensure the observance of the principles of

natural justice. The appeal is liable to be allowed accordingly.

5.

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes. The

impugned order dt. 25.03.2025 is set aside.

Order pronounced in the open court on 30.07.2025.

Sd/- Sd/- (BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH) (SUNIL KUMAR SINGH) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 30.07.2025 *aks/-

ASHOK KUMAR GOYAL,GWALIOR vs DCIT/ACIT 1(1), GWALIOR | BharatTax