DCIT, CHATRAPATTI vs. M/S. AMSTEEL CASTINGS PVT. LTD., CHENNAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal followed the Madras High Court's judgment in the case of Velayudhaswamy Spinning Mills (P) Ltd. vs. ACIT. Based on this precedent, the Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the lower authority's order.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order concerning the assessment year 2012-13. The sole issue was the deduction claimed by the assessee under Section 80IA of the Income Tax Act.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the assessee was eligible for deduction under Section 80IA of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Velayudhaswamy Spinning Mills (P) Ltd. v. ACIT213 citing340 ITR 477 · 2012 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN & SHRI D.S. SUNDER SINGH
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘बी’ �यायपीठ, चे�ई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH, CHENNAI �ी एन.आर.एस. गणेशन, �याियक सद�य एवं �ी िड.एस. सु�दर �संह, लेखा सद�य केसम� BEFORE SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI D.S. SUNDER SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No. 3036/Mds/2016 िनधा�रण वष� / Assessment Year : 2012-13 The Deputy Commissioner of M/s. Amsteel Castings P Ltd., Income Tax, v. 1C Prince Apartments, 59 Ormes Corporate Circle 1(1), Road, Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010. Chennai – 600 034 PAN:AAACA5352Q (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) (��यथ�/Respondent) अपीलाथ� क� ओर से/Appellant by : Dr. B. Nischal, JCIT ��यथ� क� ओर से/Respondent by : Shri R.M. Narayanan, CA सुनवाई क� तारीख/Date of Hearing : 24.04.2017 घोषणा क� तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 31.05.2017 आदेश आदेश /O R D E R आदेश आदेश PER N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal of the Revenue is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Chennai dated 2.08.2016 and pertains to the assessment year 2012-13. The only issue arises for consideration is deduction claimed by the assessee U/s. 80IA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’)/
When the appeal was taken for hearing Dr. B. Nischal, Ld. representative for the Revenue and Shri R.M. Narayanan, the Ld. representative for the assessee fairly submitted that the issue is covered in favour of the assessee by the judgment of the Madras High Court in the case of Velayudhaswamy Spinning Mills (P) Ltd. Vs. ACIT reported in 340 ITR 477. In view of the above, this Tribunal do not find any reason to interfere with the order of the lower authority. Accordingly by following the judgment of the Madras High Court in Velayudhaswamy Spinning Mills (P) Ltd. (supra), the appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed.
In the result, the appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed.
Order pronounced on 31st May, 2017 at Chennai.
More judgments on Section 80IA
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 964/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur… vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 963/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 964/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur… vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 963/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Klsr Infratech Limited, Hyderabad vs DCIT, Central Circle-1(2), HyderabadITA 2323/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sunita Bhagat Proprietor Of Krishab Impex vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Arun Aloysius Barnes vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 14 Oct 2026
- Gr Infra Projects Limited Ratlam Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Pankaj Das vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026