VED- VACHASPATI SHASTRI CHARITABLE TRUST,JAIPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES, ‘B’ JAIPUR Jh jkBkSM+ deys'k t;UrHkkbZ] ys[kk lnL; ,o Jh ujsUnz dqekj] U;kf;d lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM & SHRI NARINDER KUMAR, JM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 419/JP/2024 cuke Ved-Vachaspati Shastri CIT Vs. Charitable Trust, Rajendra (Exemption), Jaipur Nagar, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AACTV 6240 R vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Sh. Pawan Sharma, proxy for Sh. S.K.Mathur, CA. jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by : Ms. Alka Gautam, CIT.(through V.C). lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@ Date of Hearing : 16/10/2024 mn?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@Date of Pronouncement: 16/10/2024 vkns'k@ ORDER

PER: Narinder Kumar, Judicial Member

Appellant is feeling aggrieved by order dated 27.09.2023 passed by Learned CIT(E), Jaipur, whereby its application u/s 80G of the Income Tax Act, has been rejected. Along with appeal, appellant also filed an application seeking condonation of delay in filing the appeal.

2 ITA No. 419/JP/2024 Ved-Vachaspati Shastri Charitable Trust, Jaipur vs CIT Exemption 2. In the application seeking condonation of delay of 130 days, it has

been alleged that trustees of the applicant were not aware of the remedy

available in case of rejection of an application u/s 80G(5) of the Act.

Further, it has been alleged that there was no mala fide intention in late

filing of the appeal. Accordingly, it has been prayed that delay in filing of the

appeal may be condoned. Along with the application seeking condonation

of delay, affidavit of one of the trustees -authorized representative of the

applicant- has been filed.

trustees were not aware of the remedy available, same would be of no avail

to the applicant. Law presumes that the citizens are having knowledge of

the legal remedies as well.

As is available from the impugned order passed by ld. CIT(E), there was

non-appearance on behalf of the applicant-appellant before ld. CIT(E),

except in response to the last notice issued by his office.

The application u/s 80G of the Act came to be rejected on two

grounds-

3 ITA No. 419/JP/2024 Ved-Vachaspati Shastri Charitable Trust, Jaipur vs CIT Exemption (i) that the application was filed beyond the prescribed period

of limitation and

(ii) because no copy of trust deed/certificate was furnished on

behalf of the applicant before ld. CIT(E).

As is available from the impugned order, as regards non-production

of copy of the trust deed/certificate, applicant had expressed inability to lay

hand thereon or get the same from the concerned institutions.

Said reply is stated to have been submitted to the show cause notice

dated 11.09.2023. It was followed by the impugned order which came to be

passed soon therefore on 27.09.2023.

of the Act as not maintainable because of the filing thereof after expiry of

more than six months period from the commencement of the activities.

while observing that the applicant was required to file application in Form

No.10AB, under clause (iii) of first proviso to sub-section (5) of section 80G

of the Act within the time period of atleast 6 months prior to expiry of period

4 ITA No. 419/JP/2024 Ved-Vachaspati Shastri Charitable Trust, Jaipur vs CIT Exemption of the provisional approval or within 6 months of commencements of its

activities, whichever is earlier.

Learned CIT(E) went on to refer to earlier circulars issued by CBDT

from time to time extending the time for filing of form 10AB, and observed

that the period of limitation prescribed for filing of application under clause

(iii) of the first proviso to section 80G of the Act had not been extended.

As observed in the order, applicant had begun its activities since FY

2020-21 itself. Ultimately, Learned CIT(E) dismissed the application being

barred by time.

At this stage, it is pertinent to mention that vide circular No.7 of

25.4.2024, CBDT extended time for filing of suchlike applications. Relevant

portion of the circular is extracted hereunder:

“….3. On consideration of the matter, with a view to avoid and

mitigate genuine hardship in such cases, the Board, in exercise of the

powers conferred under section 119 of the Act, hereby extends the

due date of making an application/intimation electronically in

(i) Form No. lOA, in case of an application under clause (i) of the

first proviso to clause (23C) of section 10 or under sub-clause (i) of

clause (ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A or under clause (i) of the

first proviso to sub-section (5) of section 80G or in case of an

5 ITA No. 419/JP/2024 Ved-Vachaspati Shastri Charitable Trust, Jaipur vs CIT Exemption intimation under fifth proviso of sub section (I) of section 35 of the

Act, till 30.06.2024;

(ii) Form No. 10AB, in case of an application under clause (iii) of

the first proviso to clause (23C) of section 10 or under sub-clause (iii)

of clause (ac) of sub-section (I) of section 12A or under clause (iii) of

the first proviso to sub-section (5) of section 80G of the Act, till

30.06.2024.”

It is true that the impugned order came to be passed even before the

above-said circular was issued. But, it is significant to note that vide above-

said circular, CBDT went on to issue directions in cases where any trust,

institution or fund had already made an application in Form No. lOAB, and

where the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner has passed an order

rejecting such application, on or before the issuance of this Circular, solely

on account of the fact that the application was furnished after the due date

or that the application had been furnished under the wrong section of the

Act, it might furnish a fresh application in Form No. 10AB within the

extended time provided in paragraph 3(ii) i.e. 30.06.2024.

Present appeal came to be presented well before 30.6.2024. So, the

applicant opted to avail of this remedy of filing of appeal. The applicant

6 ITA No. 419/JP/2024 Ved-Vachaspati Shastri Charitable Trust, Jaipur vs CIT Exemption trust, if so advised, could withdraw this appeal and even file fresh

application by 30.6.2024 as per the time extended by CBDT. But, it

appears that the appellant opted to proceed with the appeal and the

application seeking condonation of delay. Otherwise, the applicant could

resort to the remedy made available under circular No.7 dated 25.4.2024,

while withdrawing this appeal.

No material from the side of the department has been referred to, so

as to attribute any mala fide intention in late filing of the appeal. Keeping in

view all this, we deem it a fit case for condonation of the delay in filing of

the appeal. We order accordingly.

of the Act as not maintainable because of the filing thereof after expiry of

more than six months period from the commencement of the activities.

Learned CIT(E) rejected the application under section 80G of the Act

while observing that the applicant was required to file application in Form

No.10AB, under clause (iii) of first proviso to sub-section (5) of section 80G

of the Act within the time period of atleast 6 months prior to expiry of period

of the provisional approval or within 6 months of commencements of its

activities, whichever is earlier.

7 ITA No. 419/JP/2024 Ved-Vachaspati Shastri Charitable Trust, Jaipur vs CIT Exemption Learned CIT(E) referred to previous circulars issued by CBDT from

time to time extending the time for filing of form 10AB, and observed that

the period of limitation prescribed for filing of application under clause (iii) of

the first proviso to section 80G of the Act had not been extended.

As observed in the order, applicant had begun its activities since FY

2020-21 itself. Ultimately, Learned CIT(E) dismissed the application being

barred by time.

However, in view of the above discussion and having regard to the

benevolent directions issued by CBDT vide circular No.7 dated 25.4.2024,

we observe that the application under section 80G of the Act deserves to

be decided afresh on merits.

the Income and Expenditure Account for the F.Y 2020-21 to 2022-23, ld.

CIT(E) noticed that the trust applicant had donated certain amounts to two

entities i.e. Shree Chotu Singh Arya Dharmath Samiti & the ICM

Educational Institute, on various dates.

As is available from impugned order, show cause notice dated

11.09.2023 was issued by the office of Learned CIT(E), to the applicant to

furnish details of the said donations. At the same time, applicant was

8 ITA No. 419/JP/2024 Ved-Vachaspati Shastri Charitable Trust, Jaipur vs CIT Exemption directed to produce copy of trust deed/certificate u/s 12A r.w.s 80G of the

Act, as regards abovesaid two entities, to whom the donations was stated

to have been made.

As is further available from the impugned order, despite said

opportunity, the applicant trust did not submit copy of trust deed/certificate

u/s 12A r.w.s 80G of the IT Act. Its response to the said show cause notice

was that the applicant was unable to collect copy of trust deed/certificate.

In absence of the trust deeds of the above said two entities. Ld.

CIT(E) found it difficult to ascertain as to whether the said trusts had

objects similar to the objects of the applicant trust.

sufficient opportunity was granted to the applicant, said copy of trust

deeds/certificates could be furnished for perusal and consideration of ld.

CIT(E).

department to the grant of another opportunity to the applicant trust to

comply with the above-said directions of ld. CIT(E) for the purpose of due

disposal of the said application, in accordance with law.

9 ITA No. 419/JP/2024 Ved-Vachaspati Shastri Charitable Trust, Jaipur vs CIT Exemption 12. As is available from the impugned order, show cause notice dated

11.09.2023 issued by the office of ld. CIT(E) to the applicant trust was the

last show cause notice issued shortly before passing of the impugned order

which is dated 27.09.2023. We find merit in the contention that in case

sufficient time was granted to the applicant to furnish requisite copy of trust

deeds/certificates mentioned above, the applicant might have been able to

comply with said directions.

Even otherwise, when the applicant expressed inability to produce

copy of trust deeds/certificates at its end, ld. CIT(E) could call upon the

officers/representatives of the said two entities to produce said

documents/certificates, but, no such step appears to have been taken

before passing impugned order, which has led to rejection of the

application.

applicant should be afforded another opportunity to produce or secure

production of the copy of trust deeds/certificates u/s 12A r.w.s 80G of the

Act before Ld. CIT(E).

of and the application u/s 80G of the Act, filed in Form 10AB, is restored to

10 ITA No. 419/JP/2024 Ved-Vachaspati Shastri Charitable Trust, Jaipur vs CIT Exemption the files of ld. CIT(E) for decision afresh on merits, after providing

reasonable opportunity to the applicant of being heard.

We order accordingly.

Applicant-appellant to comply with the directions to be issued by ld.

CIT(E) from time to time, without fail.

Order pronounced in the open court on 16/10/2024.

Sd/- Sd/- ¼jkBkSM+ deys'k t;UrHkkbZ ½ ¼ujsUnz dqekj½ (RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI) (NARINDER KUMAR) ys[kk lnL; @Accountant Member U;kf;d lnL;@Judicial Member Tk;iqj@Jaipur fnukad@Dated:- 16/10/2024 *Ganesh Kumar, Sr. PS आदेश की प्रतिलिपि अग्रेf’ात@ब्वचल वf जीम वतकमत वितूंतकमक जवरू 1. The Appellant- Ved-Vachaspati Shastri Charitable Trust, Jaipur 2. izR;FkhZ@ The Respondent- CIT Exemption, Jaipur 3. vk;dj vk;qDr@ The ld CIT vk;dj vk;qDr¼vihy½@The ld CIT(A) 4. विभागीय प्रतिनिधि] आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर@क्त्ए प्ज्Aज्ए Jंपचनत 5. 6. xkMZ QkbZy@ Guard File (ITA No. 419/JP/2024) vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order,

सहायक पंजीकार@Aेेज. त्महपेजतंत