VINAYA SHARMA,KOTA vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOTA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the land in question was rural agricultural land and therefore not a capital asset. Consequently, the capital gains tax levied on its sale was deleted.
What were the facts?
The assessee sold agricultural land and claimed exemption under Section 10. The Assessing Officer (AO) denied the exemption and made an addition, treating the land as a capital asset. The assessee argued that the land was rural agricultural land and not a capital asset as per Section 2(14)(iii).
What were the issues?
Whether the agricultural land sold by the assessee qualifies as a 'capital asset' under Section 2(14)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, and if exemption under Section 10 is admissible.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,B JAIPUR
Before: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM
PER: RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM The present appeal is because the assessee dissatisfied with the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal), Udaipur dated 26/08/2023 [for short CIT(A) ] for assessment year 2015-16. The said order of the Id. CIT(A) arise as against the order dated 26.12.2019 passed under section 143(3) r.w.s 153A of the Income Tax Act, by ACIT, Circle, Kota.
In this appeal, the assessee has raised following grounds:- "
The impugned order u/s 143(3) rws 153A dated 26.12.2019, as well as the action taken u/s 153A and
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10
- Integrated People Development Project… vs CIT Exemptions, ChennaiITA 2970/CHNY/2026[-]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026
- Shivashankrappa Sahukar, Kalaburagi vs ITO, Ward-1, KalaburgaiITA 155/BANG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Jagrutiben Manishbhai Trivedi, Ahmedabad vs ITO Ward 6(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2644/AHD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Jagrutiben Manishbhai Trivedi, Ahmedabad vs ITO Ward 6(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2643/AHD/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Prabhakar Golkonda, Hyderabad vs ITO, Ward - 9(1), HyderabadITA 994/HYD/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026