ITO, NEW DELHI vs. SH. JASJIT SINGH, NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 497/DEL/2014Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 July 2016AY 2004-052 pages

In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the appeals filed by the Revenue were not maintainable as they violated the CBDT circular regarding the pecuniary limit for appeals. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed on this technical ground.

What were the facts?

The Revenue preferred appeals before the ITAT, but the tax effect in each appeal was below Rs. 10 lacs. This was in violation of CBDT Circular No. 21/2015, which sets a pecuniary limit for such appeals.

What were the issues?

Whether appeals filed by the Revenue are maintainable when they violate the prescribed pecuniary limits set by CBDT circulars, which have statutory force.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 268A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘D’ NEW DELHI

Before: SMT. DIVA SINGH & SHRI L.P. SAHU

For Respondent: Ms. Sulekha Verma, CIT/DR
Hearing: 25.07.2016Pronounced: 26.07.2016

ORDER Per Bench: The above appeals have been preferred by the Revenue against the action of the ld. CIT(A)-XXVIII, New Delhi – orders dated 06.11.2013 whereby he has deleted the additions as enumerated in the grounds of appeal

s before us. The assessee has also filed cross-objections, supporting the orders of the first appellate authority. The record reveals that the tax effect in each of the Revenue’s appeals comes below Rs.10 lacs. Undisputedly, the present appeals have been preferred by the Revenue in violation of CBDT Circular No. 21/2015 dated 10.12.2015, wherein the pecuniary limit for preferring the appeal by the Revenue before the ITAT has been prescribed beyond Rs.10 lacs. The above circular on pecuniary limit has now statutory force within the provisions of section 268A of the IT Act, hence, the present appeals of the Revenue are not maintainable.

2. The ld. DR requested that while dismissing the appeals as not maintainable, it may be made clear that the present order will have no precedential value.

3. In view of the above discussion, the present appeals preferred by the Revenue in violation of CBDT Circular No. 21/2015 (supra) are not maintainable and hence, the same are dismissed as such making it clear that since the present appeals have not been disposed of on merits, but due to above reason, this order will have no any judicial precedence. Accordingly, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed as non-maintainable and the cross- objections of the assessee are also dismissed as infructuous.

More judgments on Section 268A

All 3,931 judgments and leading authorities on Section 268A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →