ITO, NEW DELHI vs. SH. JASJIT SINGH, NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appeals filed by the Revenue were not maintainable as they violated the CBDT circular regarding the pecuniary limit for appeals. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed on this technical ground.
What were the facts?
The Revenue preferred appeals before the ITAT, but the tax effect in each appeal was below Rs. 10 lacs. This was in violation of CBDT Circular No. 21/2015, which sets a pecuniary limit for such appeals.
What were the issues?
Whether appeals filed by the Revenue are maintainable when they violate the prescribed pecuniary limits set by CBDT circulars, which have statutory force.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘D’ NEW DELHI
Before: SMT. DIVA SINGH & SHRI L.P. SAHU
ORDER Per Bench: The above appeals have been preferred by the Revenue against the action of the ld. CIT(A)-XXVIII, New Delhi – orders dated 06.11.2013 whereby he has deleted the additions as enumerated in the grounds of appeal
s before us. The assessee has also filed cross-objections, supporting the orders of the first appellate authority. The record reveals that the tax effect in each of the Revenue’s appeals comes below Rs.10 lacs. Undisputedly, the present appeals have been preferred by the Revenue in violation of CBDT Circular No. 21/2015 dated 10.12.2015, wherein the pecuniary limit for preferring the appeal by the Revenue before the ITAT has been prescribed beyond Rs.10 lacs. The above circular on pecuniary limit has now statutory force within the provisions of section 268A of the IT Act, hence, the present appeals of the Revenue are not maintainable.
2. The ld. DR requested that while dismissing the appeals as not maintainable, it may be made clear that the present order will have no precedential value.
3. In view of the above discussion, the present appeals preferred by the Revenue in violation of CBDT Circular No. 21/2015 (supra) are not maintainable and hence, the same are dismissed as such making it clear that since the present appeals have not been disposed of on merits, but due to above reason, this order will have no any judicial precedence. Accordingly, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed as non-maintainable and the cross- objections of the assessee are also dismissed as infructuous.
More judgments on Section 268A
- Income Tax Officer, Ajmer vs Hemant Kumar Sharma, AjmerITA 1506/JPR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Income Tax Officer, Indore vs Aashta Doshi, IndoreITA 789/IND/2025[2024-25]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer Ward -1(2)(3), Ahmedabad vs Khushal Madhavlal Darji, AhmedabadITA 82/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Mehsana vs Hemantkumar Faljibhai Chaudhary, MehsanaITA 475/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Dy. CIT-4(1), Indore vs Kiran Bajpai, IndoreITA 426/IND/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026