Loading judgment…
Facts
This is a corrigendum to a previous order issued by the Tribunal. The correction is made to state that the appeal was filed by the revenue, not the assessee, against the order dated 08.01.2024 of the CIT(Appeals).
Held
The first paragraph of the original order has been corrected to accurately reflect that the appeal was filed by the revenue. No other changes were made to the order dated 02.07.2024.
Key Issues
Correction of the party filing the appeal in the initial paragraph of the Tribunal's order. The appeal is against the order of CIT(Appeals) for AY 2017-18.
Sections Cited
Section 260A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Per Laxmi Prasad Sahu, Accountant Member
This appeal by the revenue was disposed of by the Tribunal vide order dated 02.07.2024. It is noticed that in the first para of the order it is stated that this appeal is filed by the assessee instead of revenue. Therefore the first para is substituted and modified to read as follows:- “ This appeal is filed by the revenue against the order dated 08.01.2024 of the CIT(Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [NFAC], for the AY 2017-18 on the following grounds:-
”
2. There is no other change in the order of the Tribunal dated 02.07.2024. Sd/- Sd/- ( BEENA PILLAI ) (LAXMI PRASAD SAHU ) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Bangalore, Dated, the 30th July, 2024. /Desai S Murthy / Copy to:
1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. Pr.CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT, Bangalore.