SHRI PREM INDUSTRIES,BHARATPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, BHARATPUR

PDF
ITA 877/JPR/2024Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur29 November 2024AY 2018-19Bench: SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member), SHRI NARINDER KUMAR (Judicial Member)1 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The assessee, a partnership firm, was found to have fraudulently availed Input Tax Credit (ITC) on the basis of fake invoices from two entities, M/s Sweekar Udyog and M/s Shiv Agro Sales. The Assessing Officer computed the total taxable income at Rs. 2,16,58,432/- and initiated penalty proceedings. The assessee challenged the additions made under section 69C of the Income Tax Act before the CIT(A), who dismissed the appeal.

Held

The Tribunal held that the assessee failed to establish the genuineness of the impugned purchases from M/s Sweekar Udyog and M/s Shiv Agro Sales. The Tribunal noted that the GST authorities were concerned only with GST and not the genuineness of purchases, and that the two entities did not respond to notices. The Tribunal also observed that mere payment by cheque does not prove the purpose of purchases.

Key Issues

Whether the assessee discharged its onus to prove the genuineness of purchase transactions when the suppliers were found to be bogus and their response to notices was absent?

Sections Cited

147, 144B, 271AC(1), 69C, 148, 148A, 133(6)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B-Bench” JAIPUR

Before: SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM & SHRI NARINDER KUMAR, JM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA. No. 877/JPR/2024

Hearing: 27/11/2024Pronounced: 29/11/2024

Result

51.

As a result, the appeal is disposed of, and the matter is remanded to

the Assessing Officer for the purposes of recalculations in view of the

findings recorded above and having regard to the well settled law on the

point percentage of bogus purchases and/or Gross Profit of course, after

providing opportunity to the assessee-appellant to produce there all the

relevant and admissible material, in accordance with law, so as to enable

the Assessing Officer to give effect to the decision.

Order pronounced in the open court on 29/11/2024. Sd/- Sd/- ¼jkBkSM+ deys'k t;UrHkkbZ ½ ¼ujsUnz dqekj½ (RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI) (NARINDER KUMAR) ys[kk lnL; @Accountant Member U;kf;d lnL;@Judicial Member

35 ITA No. 877/JPR/2024 Shri Prem Industries vs. ITO Tk;iqj@Jaipur fnukad@Dated:-29/11/2024 *Ganesh Kumar, Sr. PS आदेश की प्रतिलिपिअग्रेf’ात@ब्वचल वf जीम वतकमत वितूंतकमक जवरू The Appellant- Shri Prem Industries, Bharatpur 1. izR;FkhZ@ The Respondent- ITO, Ward-1, Bharatpur 2. vk;djvk;qDr@ The ld CIT 3. विभागीय प्रतिनिधि] आयकरअपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर@क्त्ए प्ज्Aज्ए Jंपचनत 4. 5. xkMZQkbZy@ Guard File ITA No. 877/JPR/2024) vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order,

सहायक पंजीकार@Aेेजज. त्महपेजतंत

SHRI PREM INDUSTRIES,BHARATPUR vs INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, BHARATPUR | BharatTax