M/S. ENHANCE FINANCE AND INSURANCE SOLUTIONS,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that both lower authorities passed ex-parte orders without considering the merits. To ensure justice and cut short litigation, the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed ex-parte as no one appeared on behalf of the assessee. The assessment order was also passed ex-parte.
What were the issues?
Whether the lower authorities erred in passing ex-parte orders without adjudicating on the merits of the case.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES : B : NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL, AM & SHRI N.K. CHOUDHRY, JM
PER N.K. CHOUDHRY, JM:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the ex parte orders passed by the CIT(A) on 06.01.2014 in relation to the assessment year 2008- 09.
None appeared on behalf of the assessee despite notice.
We have heard the Ld DR and perused the relevant material on record. It is suffice to say that both the authorities below passed the impugned orders ex-parte. The Ld CIT(A) passed the ex-parte order dismissing the appeal of the Assessee without going into the merits of the case and has not given any independent finding in the absence of the Assessee therefore the Assessee preferred the instant appeal.
In the present circumstances it become incumbent upon to dispose of the appeal on merits, however because the Assessment Order has also been passed ex-parte, therefore to cut short the litigation and for the ends of justice, it would be proper and appropriate to restore back the matter to the file of Ld. Assessing officer for passing the assessment order afresh as per law after affording reasonable opportunities of being heard to the Assessee, hence ordered accordingly.
In the result, the appeal filled by the Assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 19.08.2016
Sd/- Sd/-
[R.S. SYAL] [N.K. CHOUDHRY] ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated, 19th August, 2016. dk
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026