SH. SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA,GHAZIABAD vs. ITO, GHAZIABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order of the CIT(A). During the hearing, the assessee's counsel requested to withdraw the appeal as a revision order under Section 263 had been passed, directing a fresh assessment.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be withdrawn due to a subsequent revision order directing a fresh assessment.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘SMC-3’, NEW DELHI
Before: Sh. N. K. Saini
ORDER This is an appeal by the assessee against the order dated 21.10.2015 of ld. CIT(A), Ghaziabad.
At the time of hearing ld. Counsel of the assessee filed an application stating therein as under: “Dear Sir, We, on behalf of and under instructions from our client Shri Sanjeev Kumar Sharma (herein after referred to as "Appellant") with reference to captioned appeal for the Assessment Year 2009-10, submits as under:- That against the order passed u/s 143(3)/147 dated 27.02.2014, a revision order u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was passed directing the assessing officer to make a fresh assessment. Copy of the order is enclosed herewith for your kind perusal.
2 Sanjeev Kumar Sharma In the above circumstances, the appellant is not pressing this appeal with a right to represent the matter a fresh if required based upon the fresh assessment order. The Hon'ble bench is requested to kindly pass an appropriate order. Should your Honour require any further details / clarifications, we shall be pleased to submit the same.” Yours faithfully, Sd/- (Rajeev Ahuja) CA 3. In his rival submissions the ld. DR did not object if the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the above, the request of the ld. Counsel for the assessee is accepted. Accordingly, the appeal filed by the assessee stands dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed. (Order Pronounced in the Court on 07/09/2016)
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026