No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH: KOLKATA
Before: Shri P.M. Jagtap & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi
ORDER Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi, JM:
This appeal by the Assessee is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), 2, Kolkata dt. 04-02-2016 for the A.Y 2008-09.
The only issue to be decided as to whether the CIT-A is justified in passing ex prate order without giving reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee in the facts and circumstances of the case.
The ld.AR submits that the assessee put in appearance before the CIT-A in response to notice issued u/s. 250 of the Act through its representative. But, however, the CIT-A without giving reasonable opportunity disposed off the appeal ex parte and prayed to remand the appeal issues to the file of CIT-A for fresh adjudication.
On the other hand, the ld.DR opposed to the same as submitted by the ld.AR of the assessee. He also submitted that inspite of having sufficient opportunity of hearing the assessee did not prosecute its case, but sought adjournments many times and prayed to dismiss the appeal of the assessee.
Heard both the parties and perused the record. Before us the ld.AR submitted that the CIT-A passed ex parte order without giving sufficient time to assessee to prosecute its case. We find that the AO determined the total taxable income of the assessee at Rs.2,26,63,998/-. In our opinion that for the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee before the CIT-A requires assistance of assessee by placing evidences in support of the contention. Since the CIT-A passed ex parte order admittedly there was no representation on behalf of the assessee in the first appellate proceedings, taking into consideration the submissions of the assessee and in the interest of justice, we deem it fit and proper to remand the issue(s) to the file of the CIT-A for his fresh consideration and to pass a fresh order as per law. The assessee shall be at liberty to file evidences, if any, to substantiate his case. The assessee is also directed not to seek any further adjournment before the CIT-A in the first appellate proceedings. Therefore, the grounds raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.
Order pronounced in the open court on 25-10-2017