TALHA AHMAD,ALIGARH vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-4(1)(1), ALIGARH

PDF
ITA 376/AGR/2025Status: DisposedITAT Agra28 October 2025AY 2020-21Bench: SHRI S.RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member), SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH (Judicial Member)3 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AGRA BENCH ‘SMC’ : AGRA.

For Appellant: Ms. Meetakshi Rastogi, CA
For Respondent: Shri Shailendra Srivastava, Sr. DR
Hearing: 13.10.2025

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AGRA BENCH ‘SMC’ : AGRA. BEFORE SHRI S.RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER and SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.376/AGR/2025 (Assessment Year: 2020-21) Talha Ahmad, vs. DCIT, Circle 4(1)(1), Ameen Pardhan Wali Gali, Agra. Doharra, Aligarh – 202 001 (Uttar Pradesh). (PAN : BHAPA6050J) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : Ms. Meetakshi Rastogi, CA REVENUE BY : Shri Shailendra Srivastava, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 13.10.2025 Date of Order : 28.10.2025 O R D E R PER S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTATN MEMBER : 1. The assessee has filed appeal against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [“Ld. CIT(A)”, for short] dated 13.05.2025 for the Assessment Year 2020-21. 2. At the time of hearing, ld. AR for the assessee brought to our notice that the ld. CIT (A) decided the issue against the assessee by observing that assessee has not pursued the appeal despite being granted several opportunities and the details are given in the first appellate order by relying on several decisions and dismissed the appeal in limine. He submitted that ld. CIT (A) has not decided

2 ITA No.374/AGR/2025

the issue on merit and prayed that this issue may be remitted back to the ld. CIT(A) with the prayer to give an opportunity of being heard to the assessee. He submitted that there are reasons for assessee for not appearing before the first appellate authority. 3. On the other hand, ld. DR for the Revenue objected to the submissions of the ld. counsel for the assessee and submitted that assessee has not utilised several opportunities granted by ld. CIT (A). 4. Considered the rival submissions and material placed on record. We observe that the addition was sustained by the ld. CIT (A) relying on the order of Assessing Officer ex-parte. Therefore, in the interest of justice, we direct ld. CIT (A) to give an opportunity of being heard to the assessee and decide the issue on merit as per law. We also direct assessee to make proper submissions and appear before the ld.CIT (A) on the date of hearing and cooperate with the tax authorities. Accordingly, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. 5. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on this 28th day of October, 2025.

Sd/- sd/- (SUNIL KUMAR SINGH) (S.RIFAUR RAHMAN) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated:28.10.2025 TS

3 ITA No.374/AGR/2025

TALHA AHMAD,ALIGARH vs DCIT,CIRCLE-4(1)(1), ALIGARH | BharatTax