DCIT, BANGALORE vs. M/S SKYLINE CONSTRUCTION & HOUSING PVT. LTD., BANGALORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 561/BANG/2011Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore04 November 2016AY 2005-063 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal upheld the CIT(Appeals)'s order, confirming that the assessee was entitled to the deduction. This decision was based on a previous Tribunal ruling that was subsequently approved by the jurisdictional High Court.

What were the facts?

The revenue appealed against the CIT(Appeals)'s decision to grant relief under Section 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act. The core dispute was whether the assessee met the conditions for this deduction, specifically regarding the size of residential units.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee satisfied the conditions stipulated in Section 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act for claiming deduction, particularly concerning the size of residential units.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80IB(10)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH : BANGALORE

Before: SHRI SUNIL KUMAR YADAV & SHRI S. JAYARAMAN

For Appellant: Shri G.R. Reddy, CIT-I(DR)
For Respondent: Shri K.R. Pradeep, CA
Hearing: 01.11.2016Pronounced: 04.11.2016

Per Sunil Kumar Yadav, Judicial Member

1.

These appeals are preferred by the revenue against the order of CIT(Appeals) on the common ground that the CIT(Appeals) has failed to appreciate the fact that relief u/s. 80IB(10) of the I.T. Act cannot be allowed to the projects, if one of the residential units exceeds 1500 sq.ft.

2.

During the course of hearing of the appeals, the ld. counsel for the assessee has invited our attention that the CIT(Appeals) has adjudicated the issue in the light of decision of the Tribunal in the case of Brigade Enterprises, 119 TTJ Bang 269. This order of the Tribunal was approved by the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka. Copy of the judgment of the Hon’ble High Court is placed on record, in which the following question was referred to the Hon’ble High Court for consideration:- “Whether the Appellate Authorities were correct in holding that the assessee would be entitled to claim deduction u/s. 80IB(10) of the Act in respect of its Millennium project despite the assessee not satisfying the conditions stipulated in Clauses (a) to (d) of Section 80IB(10) of the Act?”

3.

The question referred to the Hon’ble High Court was answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue.

4.

Since the CIT(Appeals) has adjudicated the issue following the order of the Tribunal which was later on approved by the jurisdictional High Court, we find no infirmity in the order of CIT(Appeals). Accordingly, we confirm the same.

In the result, the appeals are dismissed. 5.

Pronounced in the open court on this 04th day of November, 2016.

More judgments on Section 80IB(10)

All 838 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80IB(10) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →