Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SMC, BENGALURU BENCH C, BENGALURU
Before: SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SMC, BENGALURU BENCH 'C', BENGALURU BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, JUDICIAL MEMBER (Assessment Year : 2008-09) Shri. Seetaramaiah Setty Chigarambatla, Prop : C. Seetaramaiah & Co., Patel Road, 11-11-60, Bresthawarpet, Raichur 584 101 .. Appellant PAN : ADLPC9091R v. Income-tax Officer, Ward – 1, Raichur .. Respondent Assessee by : None Revenue by : Smt. S. Praveena, Addl. CIT Heard on : 30.11.2016 Pronounced on : 30.11.2016 O R D E R PER GEORGE GEORGE K, JUDICIAL MEMBER :
This is an appeal filed by assessee against an order dt 15.07.2016, passed by the CIT (A), Gulbarga (Kalaburagi), for the A. Y. 2008-09.
When the appeal was called up for hearing, nobody appeared for assessee. It is seen from records that in spite of the date of hearing being ITA.1688/Bang/2016 Page - 2 mentioned in the notice of hearing, which has been issued and served on the assessee, nobody was present on the date of hearing. In the circumstances, we are of the opinion that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting its case. We dismiss the appeal following the decision of the Delhi Bench of the ITAT in CIT v. Multiplan India P.Ltd., (1991) 38 ITD 320 and of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Estate of late Tukoji Rao Holkar v. CWT (1997) 223 ITR 480, as the appeal is infructuous for non- prosecution.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed.