SOMNATH,FARIDABAD, HARYANA vs. ASSESSING OFFICER, FARIDABAD

PDF · subscribers
ITA 5073/DEL/2025Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 December 2025AY 2017-18Bench: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member), SHRI RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN (Judicial Member)2 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the matter required a denovo assessment in the interest of justice. Therefore, the issues were remitted back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh decision.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) who dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution and also for not admitting additional evidence. The Assessing Officer had passed an ex-parte assessment order under Section 144.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee was granted adequate opportunities and if the matter should be remitted for denovo assessment.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 144

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘E’: NEW DELHI

For Respondent: Ms. Ankush Kalra, Sr. DR
Hearing: 09.12.2025

PER S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :

1.

The assessee has filed appeal against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [“Ld. CIT(A)”, for short] dated 24.06.2025 for the Assessment Year 2017-18.

2.

None appeared on behalf of the assessee. We proceeded to adjudicate the issue with the assistance of ld. DR of the Revenue.

3.

At the time of hearing, we observed that the ld. CIT (A) decided the issue against the assessee by observing that assessee has not pursued the appeal despite being granted several opportunities. Further he has also not admitted the additional evidences filed by the assessee at the appellate stage and dismissed the appeal of the assessee. We also observed that the Assessing Officer has also passed the assessment order u/s 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961(for short ‘the Act’) ex-parte.

4.

On the other hand, ld. DR for the Revenue relied on the orders of the authorities below.

5.

Considered the submissions of the ld. DR of the Revenue and material placed on record. Upon careful consideration, we are of the considered view that in the interest of justice, the matter requires denovo assessment. Therefore, we remit back the issues to the file of the Assessing Officer with the directions to decide the same afresh, after giving adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee, for which Ld. DR has no objection. Assessee is directed to fully cooperate with the AO during the proceedings. We hold and direct accordingly.

6.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on this 9th day of December, 2025 after the conclusion of the hearing.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →