No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘SMC-3’, NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI H.S. SIDHU
per sub-section III of section 3 of 194A of I.T. Act. Therefore, the
assessee is not liable to treat as defaulter as per proviso 40(a) of
I.T. Act and A.O. was not justified in disallowing the interest
payment to the bank without deduction tax. Accordingly, the
addition made on account of non deduction of TDS on account of
ITA NO.6525/Del/2015 7
interest paid on loan from banking concern of Rs. 35,06,062/- was
rightly deleted by the Ld. CIT(A), which does not need any
interference on my part, hence, I uphold the same and accordingly,
the ground raised by the Revenue stands dismissed.
In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the Open Court on 30/08/2016. Sd/-
(H.S. SIDHU) JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 30/8/2016 *SR BHATNAGAR* Copy forwarded to: - 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT TRUE COPY By Order,
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR