MRS. MEHRUN NISHA ANSARI,GHAZIABAD vs. ITO, GHAZIABAD

PDF · subscribers
ITA 5898/DEL/2014Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 August 2016AY 2009-102 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the issue of ownership of the property was restored to the AO in a previous related appeal. Therefore, the current appeal's outcome depends on the AO's findings regarding ownership and sources.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order for the assessment year 2009-10. The issue of property ownership was central to the appeal.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the ownership of a property and the determination of its sources, which was dependent on a prior ITAT ruling.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘SMC-I’ NEW DELHI

Before: SMT DIVA SINGH

For Appellant: Adv. &
For Respondent: Mr. Amrit Lal, Sr. DR
Hearing: 18.08.2016Pronounced: 30.08.2016

The present appeal has been filed by the assessee assailing the correctness of the order dated 04.07.2014 of CIT(A), Ghaziabad pertaining to 2009-10 assessment year on various grounds.

2.

The common stand of the parties before the Bench was that the issue is covered by the order dated 08.04.2016 in & 5897/Del/2014 as the issue of ownership qua the very same property had been restored to the AO by the ITAT and thus the finding herein would depend on the conclusion arrived at therein thus the issue may be restored. On considering the material available on record and the aforesaid order of the ITAT, it is seen that the stand of the parties in the facts as they stand is justified. It is only after the claim of ownership is established alongwith the sources that the issue can be decided. Accordingly, in view of the above, the impugned order is set aside and the issue is restored to the file of the AO with a direction to pass a speaking order in accordance with law after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being

I.T.A .No.-5898/Del/2014 heard. The said order was pronounced on the date of hearing itself in the open Court. 3. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed. The order is pronounced in the open court on 30th of August, 2016.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →