Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Before: SHRI G.D. AGRAWALG.D. AGRAWAL & AND BEFORE SHRI G.D. AGRAWALG.D. AGRAWAL & AND SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARGSHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG
PER G.D. AGRAWAL, VP PER G.D. AGRAWAL, VP :- PER G.D. AGRAWAL, VP PER G.D. AGRAWAL, VP This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2007-08 is directed against the order of learned CIT(A)-XVII, New Delhi dated 6th September, 2013.
At the time of hearing before us, nobody appeared on behalf of the assessee-appellant despite the fact that the date of hearing was informed to both the parties in the open Court on the last occasion i.e. 10th May, 2016, when the matter was adjourned at the request of the assessee. On an earlier occasion also on 10th November, 2015, nobody appeared on behalf of the assessee.
In view of the above, we are of the opinion that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting this appeal. While taking this view, we
2 ITA-6587/Del/2013 derive support from the decision of Delhi Bench of ITAT in the case of CIT vs. Multiplan India (P.) Ltd. – [1991] 38 ITD 320 (Delhi). Accordingly, we dismiss the assessee’s appeal in limine.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed in limine. Decision pronounced in the open Court on 31.08.2016.