ANASUYA BANERJEE RAY,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIR-20, KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay, finding a reasonable cause for it. The matter was remanded back to the CIT(A) to decide the appeal on merits after providing a proper opportunity of being heard to the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed a belated appeal before the CIT(A) with a delay of 153 days. The delay was attributed to the assessee's counsel misplacing the case papers.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) should be condoned and the appeal decided on merits.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH: KOLKATA
Per Shri A.T.Varkey, JM
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-18, Kolkata dated 24.11.2015 for AY 2011-12.
The main grievance of the assessee in this appeal is against the order of Ld. CIT(A) not to admit the belated appeal without giving proper opportunity of being heard to the assessee.
At the time of hearing, we note that before the Ld. CIT(A) there was a delay of 153 days. The delay was caused, according to the assessee, was because of the mistake of Ld. Counsel Shri Sandip Saha, who happened to misplace the papers, which caused the delay and we are of the opinion that for the mistake of Ld. Counsel, the assessee could not be penalized and there is a reasonable cause for condoning the delay. Since the Ld. CIT(A) has not condoned the delay on surmises and conjectures, we are inclined to condone the delay and remand the matter back to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) to decide the appeal on merits afresh after affording reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee. Assessee is also directed to appear before the Ld. CIT(A) on 06.12.2017 and to cooperate with the
In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order is pronounced in the open court on 17th November, 2017 Sd/- Sd/- (J. Sudhakar Reddy) (Aby. T. Varkey) Accountant Member Judicial Member Dated :17th November, 2017 Jd.(Sr.P.S.) Copy of the order forwarded to: Appellant – Smt. Anasuya Banrjee Ray, Joint Plant Committee, Ispat 1. Niketan, 52/1A, Ballygunge Circular Road, Kolkata-700 019. Respondent – ACIT, circle-20, Kolkata. 2 The CIT(A), Kolkata 3.
4. CIT , Kolkata 5. DR, Kolkata Benches, Kolkata /True Copy, By order,
Sr. Pvt. Secretary
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026