M/S IMC LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-11, KOLKATA, KOLKATA
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that Rule 8D is not applicable for assessment years prior to 2008-09. Therefore, the disallowance made under Section 14A by applying Rule 8D for AY 2005-06 was bad in law.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was against the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(A) had confirmed this disallowance by applying Rule 8D.
What were the issues?
The applicability of Rule 8D for assessment years prior to 2008-09 in the context of disallowance under Section 14A.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. v. DCIT1,183 citing328 ITR 81 · 2010 · HC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH ‘B’ KOLKATA
Before: Shri J. Sudhakar Reddy, AM & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, JM]
Per J. Sudhakar Reddy, AM This is an appeal filed by the assessee directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) – 10, Kolkata dated 12.06.2015 for the assessment year 2005-06. 2. The sole issue agitated by the assessee in this appeal is the disallowance made by the A.O. under section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act). The Ld. CIT (A) has confirmed the disallowance by applying Rule 8D. It is now settled that Rule 8D is not applicable prior to the assessment year 2008-09. I rely on the judgment of Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd. 328 ITR 81. 2 Assessment Year: 2005-06 M/s. I.M.C. Ltd.
Hence this disallowance made under section 14A by applying Rule 8D of I.T. Rule 1962 for A.Y. 2005-06 is bad in law.
In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is allowed. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 17th November, 2017. (S.S. Viswanethra Ravi) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated: 17/11/2017 Biswajit, Sr. PS Copy of order forwarded to:
M/s. IMC Ltd., 232/A, A.J.C. Bose Road, Kolkata – 700020. 2. DCIT, Circle 11, Aayakar Bhawan, P-7, Chowringhee Square, Kolkata – 700069. 3. The CIT(A)
The CIT
DR, By order, Sr. P.S. / H.O.O. ITAT, Kolkata
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Akshaya Consortium vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026