MALATESH BEGOOR NADIG ,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6(2)(1), BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned by excluding the COVID-19 period, as per the Supreme Court's decision. The matter was set aside to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the CIT(A) with a delay of 69 days. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal as not maintainable due to the delay, as the assessee did not explain it.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) due to the COVID-19 pandemic should be condoned.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Not specified
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- 134 Taxmann.com 30753 citing134 Taxmann.com 307 · 2022 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI WASEEM AHMED & SHRI PRAKASH CHAND YADAV
PER WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order passed by the NFAC, Delhi dated 31/05/2024 vide DIN No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-25/1065299599(1) for the assessment year 2010-11.
At the outset, we note that there was a delay of 69 days by the assessee in filing the appeal before the ld. CIT-A. The delay in filing the appeal by the assessee was not explained during the proceedings before the ld. CIT-A. Therefore, the ld. CIT-A in his order dated 31-05-2024 concluded that the appeal filed by the assessee is not maintainable. However, on perusal of the orders of authorities below, we note that the assessment was framed vide order dated 13 August 2021 and the appeal was instituted dated 20 November 2021 with the delay of 69 days. In this regard, it is important to note that there was an outbreak of covid pandemic during the period when the appeal was to be filed before the ld. CIT-A. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Cognizance for Extension of Limitation, In re reported in 134 Taxmann.com 307 has excluded the covid period for calculating the time limit for filing the appeal from 15-3- 2020 to 28-02-2022. Thus, we hold that the delay in filing the appeal by the assessee is to be excluded while calculating the deadline for filing the appeal. Hence, we are of the view that there was sufficient and reasonable cause which prevented the assessee from filing the appeal within the statutory time limit. Accordingly, the delay in the case in hand deserves to be condoned. Consequently, we are setting aside the issue to the file of the learned CIT-A for fresh adjudication as per the provisions of law after condoning the delay in filing the appeal by the assessee. Hence, the ground of appeal of the assessee is hereby allowed for statistical purposes.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026