FATEH STEEL METAL WORKS,NEW DELHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 5084/DEL/2025Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 December 2025AY 2012-2013Bench: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member), SHRI RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN (Judicial Member)2 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal, considering the interest of justice, decided that a denovo assessment was required. The issues were remitted back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh decision after providing adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the Ld. CIT(A) which affirmed the action of the Assessing Officer. The assessment order was passed under Section 144/147 of the Income-tax Act without giving proper opportunity to the assessee.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessment order passed under Section 144/147 was valid without providing proper opportunity to the assessee.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 144,Section 147

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘E’: NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN & SHRI RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN

For Appellant: Shri Mohammad Ammar, CA, Shri Tariq Nafees, Advocate
For Respondent: Ms. Amisha S Gupt, CIT DR
Hearing: 10.12.2025

PER S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :

1.

The assessee has filed appeal against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [“Ld. CIT(A)”, for short] dated 26.10.2023 for the Assessment Year 2012-13.

2.

At the outset, it was submitted by the ld. AR for the assessee that Assessing Officer has passed the assessment order under section 144/147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) without giving proper opportunity to the assessee and Ld. CIT(A) affirmed the action of the AO. Ld. DR relied upon the orders of the authorities below.

3.

Considered the rival submissions and perused the material on record. Upon careful consideration, we are of the considered view that in the interest of justice, the matter requires denovo assessment. Therefore, we remit back the issues to the file of the Assessing Officer with the directions to decide the same afresh, after giving adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee, for which Ld. DR has no objection. Assessee is directed to fully cooperate with the AO during the proceedings. We hold and direct accordingly.

4.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on this 10th day of December, 2025 after the conclusion of the hearing.

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →