M/S EMERSON AUTOMATION SOLUTIONS INTELLIGENT PLATFORMS PVT. LTD,,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, C-3(1)(2), BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the appeal regarding payments made to headquarters for services received, stating that the genuineness of expenses is key, not necessarily the immediate benefit. Other grounds were allowed for statistical purposes or remanded.
What were the facts?
The assessee, engaged in manufacturing and trading of automation products, filed its return for AY 2014-15. The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) made significant adjustments to the assessee's income related to international transactions.
What were the issues?
The primary issues involved the correctness of transfer pricing adjustments, including the applicability of methods, adjustments for custom duty, working capital, and payments to headquarters for services.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Sony India (P) Ltd. v. DCIT131 citing114 ITD 448 · 2008 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BENGALURU “B” BENCH, BENGALURU
PER: PRAKASH CHAND YADAV,J.M.
Present appeal of the assessee is arising from the order of ld. AO / DRP dated 30th October, 2018. The assessee has raised 19 grounds of appeal out of which ground Nos. 1 to 5 are general in nature and hence not required specific adjudication. Ground No. 6 related to the grievance of the assessee with respect to the adjustment of custom duty, base cost, working capital not granted by the AO while completing the assessment.
Ground No. 7 is with respect to the applicability of TNMM method
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 92CA
- Bellsonica Auto Component India Private… vs ACIT, Circle-1(1), GurgaonITA 1041/DEL/2023[2015-16]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Smartstream Technologies India Private… vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2220/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- ACIT-Circle 6(1)(1) Mumbai, Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited, MumbaiITA 7767/MUM/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- ACIT-Circle6(1)(1) Mumbai., Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited, MumbaiITA 7766/MUM/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Airmeet Networks Private Limited, Bengaluru vs Assessing Officer, BengaluruITA 1487/BANG/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026