AVADH BIHARI SMARAK EDUCATIONAL TRUST,RANCHI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTION, PATNA, RANCHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the issues to the file of the CIT(Exemption) to grant the assessee another opportunity to present its case and substantiate its claims. The assessee failed to provide a satisfactory response regarding the irrevocable clause.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Avadh Bihari Smarak Educational Trust, appealed against the denial of recognition under Section 80G by the CIT(Exemption). The assessee did not provide complete explanations or all necessary details to the CIT(E).
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee provided sufficient explanation and documentation to the CIT(Exemption) for obtaining recognition under Section 80G, particularly concerning the irrevocable clause.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RANCHI BENCH, RANCHI
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY
Assessee represented by None Department represented by Shri Rajib Jain, CIT-DR Date of hearing 07/01/2026 Date of pronouncement 07/01/2026 O R D E R PER: BENCH 1. This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT(Exemption), Patna dated 23/09/2024 denying the assessee the benefit of recognition under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, the Act).
None represented on behalf of the assessee and only adjournment application is filed and Shri Rajib Jain, ld. CIT-DR represented on behalf of the revenue.
A perusal of the order of the ld. CIT(E) shows that in para 4, the ld. CIT(E) has recorded that the documents have been submitted but no explanation has been given on the issue raised on the irrevocable clause. As it is noticed that the assessee has not given response in its entirety before the ld. CIT(E)
Avadh Bihari Smarak Educational Trust Vs CIT(E) and the assessee has not provided all the details before the ld. CIT(E), therefore, the issues in this appeal are restored to the file of ld. CIT(E) to grant the assessee another opportunity to substantiate its case before the ld. CIT(E). 4. In the result, this appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes. Order announced in open court on 07/01/2026.
More judgments on Section 80G
- Savan Dayalal Ladani, Rajkot vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-2(1)…ITA 575/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pareshbhai Savjibhai Khunt, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward - 2(2)(3), RajkotITA 842/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026