RAMKRISHNA VIVEKANAND SOCIETY,DHANBAD vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PATNA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 490/RAN/2024Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi15 January 2026AY 2023-24Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma (Judicial Member), Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay (Accountant Member)1 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the assessee did not appear before the CIT(E) and the application was rejected on grounds of non-submission of documents. The Tribunal decided to remand the issue back to the CIT(E) for a fresh examination, granting the assessee a reasonable opportunity to be heard and submit necessary documents.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a trust, filed an application in Form 10AB for registration under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(E) rejected the application for assessment years 2023-24 and 2024-25 due to non-submission of supporting documents.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(E) was justified in rejecting the application for registration under Section 80G due to non-submission of documents, and whether a remand for fresh consideration is appropriate.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80G

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BENCH-RANCHI

Before: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

order

: January 15, 2026 ORDER

Per Sonjoy Sarma, Judicial Member:

1.

The present appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the separate orders both dated 25.10.2024 passed by the CIT(Exemption), Patna rejecting application for registration u/s 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the ‘Act’) for Assessment Years 2023-24 & 2024-25 respectively. Since the issues involved in both the appeals are common and relate to the same assessee, therefore, the appeals are being heard together and disposed of by this common order for the sake of convenience. First, we proceed to deal with .

2.

Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a trust and an application in Form 10AB was filed by the assessee for grant of application for registration u/s 80G of the Act. The ld. CIT(E) rejected the & 491/Ran/2024 Ramkrishna Vivekanand Society application for registration u/s 80G of the Act due to non-submission of supporting documents by the assessee.

3.

Dissatisfied with the above order, the assessee has filed the present appeals before this Tribunal. At the time of hearing, none appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, an application seeking adjournment of the case was filed. Since issue involved requires adjudication and the appeal cannot keep pending indefinitely, the adjournment application is rejected, we heard the matters with the assistance of the ld. DR.

4.

The ld. DR stated that the assessee is a habitual defaulter and the present appeal of the assessee may be dismissed.

5.

We, after hearing the ld. DR and perusing the materials available on record, find that the assessee did not turn up before the ld. CIT(E) and the ld. CIT(E) rejected the application filed in Form 10AB for registration u/s 80G of the Act due to non-submission of supporting documents. We, therefore, in the interest of justice and fair play, feel it necessary to remand the issue back to the file of the ld. CIT(E) with a direction to re- examine the issue afresh after giving reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee. We also direct the assessee to comply all notices and submit all the relevant documents/details during the remand proceedings for granting of application for registration u/s 80G of the Act. Hence, is allowed for statistical purposes.

6.

Since the facts and issues involved in are identical to those in . Accordingly, is also allowed for statistical purposes.

& 491/Ran/2024 Ramkrishna Vivekanand Society

7.

In the result, both the captioned appeals are allowed for statistical purposes. Kolkata, the 15th January, 2026.

More judgments on Section 80G

All 6,482 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80G →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →