Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BENGALURU BENCH A, BENGALURU
Before: SHRI. VIJAY PAL RAO
PER S. JAYARAMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :
This is an appeal filed by assessee against an order dt 31.01.2011 of the CIT (A), Mysuru, for the A. Y. 2007-08.
When the appeal was called up for hearing, nobody appeared for assessee. It is seen from records that in spite of the date of hearing being mentioned in the notice of hearing, which has been issued and served on the assessee by registered post with acknowledgement due, nobody was present ITA.1624/Bang/2013 Page - 2 on the date of hearing. In the circumstances, we are of the opinion that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting its case. We dismiss the appeal following the decision of the Delhi Bench of the ITAT in CIT v. Multiplan India P.Ltd., (1991) 38 ITD 320 and of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Estate of late Tukoji Rao Holkar v. CWT (1997) 223 ITR 480, as the appeal is infructuous for non-prosecution.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in open court on 23rd November, 2016.