SEWA STEEL PVT. LTD.,BHIWADI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2, ALWAR
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal decided to proceed ex-parte and, based on the available documents and the Revenue's arguments, upheld the CIT(A)'s order. The penalty was confirmed on the grounds of concealment of income.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was against the CIT(A)'s order confirming the addition of Rs. 1,02,293/- on account of investment subsidy and a penalty of Rs. 74,603/-. The assessee did not appear for the hearing.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the confirmation of a penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for concealment of income, which was sustained by the lower appellate authority.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”SMC’’ JAIPUR
Before: Hon’ble SHRI SANDEEP GOSAINvk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 952/JP/2019
ORDER PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against order of the ld. CIT(A), Alwar dated 14-05-2019 for the assessment year 2013-14 wherein the assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal. ‘’1. That the ld. CIT(A) grossly erred in confirming the order of the AO on addition of Rs.1,02,293/- sustained on account of investment subsidy treating it as employment generation subsidy u/s 250 in quantum.
2. That the ld. CIT(A) grossly erred in not adjudication on penalty attributable on the estimate 2.1 None appeared on behalf of the assessee when the case was called out for hearing. However, the Bench decided to proceed in the matter as per the documents available on record and heard the arguments of the ld. DR, ex-parte. 2.2 The Bench noted in this case that the solitary issue raised is against the imposition of penalty of Rs.74,603/- u/s 271(1)© of the Act which has been confirmed by the ld. CIT(A) by observing as under:- ‘’5.3 I have gone through the penalty order as well as submissions made by the appellant. The quantum proceedings has been decided and the AO has imposed penalty u/s 271(1) (c ) of the Act on the sustained part of the addition made on the ground of employment generation subsidy and investment subsidy. The appellant has also not gone into further appeal. I have considered the submission made by the appellant. In my considered view, the AO is justified in imposing penalty of Rs.74,603/- u/s 271(1)( c ) of the Act on concealment of particulars of income. The appellant’s ground of appeal on the issue is dismissed.
6. In the result, the appeal is dismissed.’’ 2.3 The Bench heard the ld. DR and considered the documents made available by the assessee concerning the issue in question. In this case, it is noted that the assessee was provided numerous opportunities to contest its case but no controverting reply from the side of the assessee was received. In this view of the 3 M/S SEWA STEELS PVT LTD. VS ACIT, CIRCLE-2, ALWAR matter, the Bench has no other alternative except to sustain the order of the ld. CIT(A). Thus the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed 3.0 Order pronounced in the open court on 18/10/2022.
Sd/- ¼lanhi xkslkbZ½ (Sandeep Gosain) U;kf;d lnL;@Judicial Member Tk;iqj@Jaipur fnukad@Dated:- 18 /10/2022 *Mishra आदेश की प्रतिलिपि अग्रेf’ात@ब्वचल वf जीम वतकमत वितूंतकमक जवरू 1. The Appellant- M/s. Sewa Steel Pvt. Ltd. Bhiwadi 2. izR;FkhZ@ The Respondent- The ACIT, Circle-2, Alwar 3. vk;dj vk;qDr@ The ld CIT 4. vk;dj vk;qDr¼vihy½@The ld CIT(A) 5. विभागीय प्रतिनिधि] आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर@क्त्ए प्ज्Aज्ए Jंपचनत 6. xkMZ QkbZy@ Guard File (ITA No. 952/JP/2019) vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order,
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026