M/S. EVERGREEN EMBROIDERY (P) LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, considering the absence of the assessee and the unrectified defect, presumed the assessee was not interested in pursuing the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was treated as unadmitted.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was listed for hearing, but no one appeared on behalf of the assessee. The assessee was also informed of a defect regarding the payment of appeal fees, which was not rectified.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal can be dismissed for non-prosecution and non-compliance with procedural requirements like payment of fees.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Rule 19(2) of the ITAT Rules
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Multiplan India Ltd.2,267 citing38 ITD 320 · 1991 · ITAT
- Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar v. CWT2,040 citing223 ITR 480 · 1997 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “B” : NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI I.P. BANSAL & SHRI B.C. MEENA
PER I.P. BANSAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER:-
The aforementioned appeal was fixed for hearing on 6th March, 2012. The assessee was also informed regarding a defect in the appeal as it was found that proper evidence for payment of appeal fees was not filed. However, on the fixed date of hearing none attended on behalf of the assessee. In these circumstances, we presume that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting its appeal. Considering these facts and keeping in mind the provisions of Rule 19(2) of the ITAT Rules as were considered by the Tribunal in CIT Vs. Multiplan (India) Pvt. Ltd. – 38 ITD 320 (Del) and M.P.High Court in the case of Late Tukoji Rao Holkar – 223 ITR 480 (MP), we treat this appeal as unadmitted.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026