MANJU KUMARI L/H AVINASH KUMAR,RAMGARH vs. ITO WARD-2(3), RAMGARH, RAMGARH
Facts
The assessee's appeal was filed with a delay of 228 days, attributed to a lack of awareness of the order. The assessee contended that the assessment order was passed ex parte without a fair opportunity of hearing, and the additions made were confirmed by the CIT(A).
Held
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal. Considering the principles of natural justice, the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment, with a direction to provide a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
Key Issues
Whether the assessment order was passed without providing a fair and reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee and whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned.
Sections Cited
147, 144, 144B
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RANCHI BENCH, RANCHI
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, RANCHI BENCH, RANCHI BEFORE SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No. 347/Ran/2025 (Assessment Year-2016-17) (Virtual Hearing) Manju Kumari, I.T.O., L/H-Avinash Kumar, Ward-2(3), Vs. C/o-Lal Babu Mahto, Maganpur, Gola, Ramgarh. Ramgarh-829110 (Jharkhand) PAN No. BDKPK 6060 N Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue
Assessee represented by None Department represented by Shri Kailash Gautam, Sr.DR Date of hearing 28/01/2026 Date of pronouncement 20/02/2026 O R D E R PER: BENCH 1. This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (NFAC)/learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), [in short, the ld. CIT(A)] dated 17/12/2024 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2016-17 as per the grounds of appeal on record. 2. We found from perusal of the record that there is a delay of 228 days in filing this appeal before this Tribunal, for which a petition for condonation of delay was filed by the assessee mentioning the fact that the delay was caused due to unaware about any such order passed or the pendency of the appellate proceedings. It is only when sometime in June, 2025, the office of the JAO has contacted the assessee for recovery of the demand alongwith interest then he came to know about the impugned order then he gathered all the
ITA No. 347/Ran/2025 Manju Kumar L/H Avinash Kumar Vs ITO relevant documents and filed the present appeal. The delay was not intentional and deliberate and beyond the control of the assessee and prayed that the delay may be condoned. The ld. Sr.DR did not raise any serious objections. Therefore, considering the contents made in the condonation petition, we condone the delay in filing the appeal before this Tribunal. 3. On merit of the case, no one has appeared on behalf of the assessee but the assessee filed a paper book and stated that the Assessing Officer passed the assessment order ex parte without giving fair and reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The assessee stated that the Assessing Officer made various additions without giving fair and reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The assessee stated that the assessment was completed on 28/03/2022 under Section 147 r.w.s. 144 r.w.s. 144B of the Act. The ld. CIT(A) confirmed the addition made by the Assessing Officer. The assessee stated that the assessee has good case on merit and is likely to succeed if one more opportunity is provided and prayed to restore the matter back to the file of Assessing Officer for readjudication on merit. 4. On the other hand, the learned Senior Departmental Representative (ld. Sr.DR) supported the orders of the revenue authorities. 5. We have considered the submissions. Before us, the assessee stated that no fair and reasonable opportunities of hearing were provided to the assessee before the Assessing Officer. One more opportunity should be provided to assessee and to decide the matter on merit. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the principles of natural justice, the matter is restored to the file of Assessing Officer considering the
ITA No. 347/Ran/2025 Manju Kumar L/H Avinash Kumar Vs ITO fact that assessment was completed under section 144 of the Act, to pass fresh assessment order in accordance with law. Needless to direct that before passing the order, the Assessing Officer shall grant reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee. The assessee is also directed to avail this opportunity and not to cause further delay and seek adjournment without any valid reasons and to furnish all the details and evidences to justify various grounds of appeal raised by her. In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes. 6. In the result, this appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes only. Order announced in open court on 20th February, 2026.
Sd/- Sd/- (GEORGE MATHAN) (RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Ranchi, Dated:20/02/2026 *Ranjan Copy to: 1. Assessee 2. Revenue 3. CIT 4. DR By order 5. Guard File Sr. Private Secretary, ITAT, Ranchi
