DCIT, CIR-9(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S DAMODAR VALLEY CORPORATION, KOLKATA
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that Section 115JB is not applicable to the assessee, a statutory corporation not registered under the Companies Act. This decision was based on a prior ruling for earlier assessment years.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Damodar Valley Corporation, engaged in steel manufacturing, filed a return declaring a loss. The Assessing Officer accepted the normal loss but determined a deemed total income under Section 115JB.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the applicability of Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act to a statutory corporation. The Tribunal also considered the retrospective or prospective application of amendments to this section.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘D’ BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: Shri P.M. Jagtap & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi
Per Shri P.M. Jagtap, Accountant Member :
This appeal is preferred by the Revenue against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-15, Kolkata dated 17.03.2016 and in the solitary ground raised therein, the Revenue has challenged the action of the ld. CIT(Appeals) in holding that the provisions of section 115JB are not applicable in the case of the assessee.
The assessee in the present case is a Corporation, which is mainly engaged in the business of manufacturing of Cold Rolled & High Tensile Steel. The return of income for the year under consideration was filed by it on 29.09.2010 declaring a loss of Rs.225.15 crores. In the assessment completed under section 143(3) vide an order dated 12.03.2013, the loss as declared by the assessee in the return of income as per the normal 2 Assessment Year: 2010-2011 provisions of the Act was accepted by the Assessing Officer. He, however, determined the deemed total income of the assessee at Rs.1,69,44,88,035/- under section 115JB of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Against the order passed by the Assessing Officer under section 143(3), an appeal was preferred by the assessee before the ld. CIT(Appeals), who held by relying on the decision of the Tribunal in assessee’s own case for A.Ys. 2008-09 and 2009-10 that the provisions of section 115JB were not applicable in the case of the assessee and accordingly directed the Assessing Officer not to assess the total income of the assessee by applying the said provision. Aggrieved by the order of the ld. CIT(Appeals), the Revenue has preferred this appeal before the Tribunal.
We have heard the arguments of both the sides and also perused the relevant material available on record. As agreed by the ld. representative of both the sides, the solitary issue involved in this appeal of the Revenue is squarely covered by the decision of the Coordinate Bench of this Tribunal rendered in assessee’s own case vide its common order dated 13.01.2016 passed in & 451/KOL/2013, wherein a similar issue was decided after discussing all the relevant aspects as well as case laws in details by the Tribunal before summarising its conclusion in paragraph no. 3.16 as under:- “The assessee is a statutory corporation not registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and hence the provisions of section 115JB of the Act are not applicable to the assessee corporation;
The amendment brought in section 115JB of the Act read with Explanation 3 thereon by the Finance Act, 2012 is applicable only with effect from asst. Year 2013-14 onwards in line with the Notes of Clauses of Finance Act, 2012, and A statutory claim could be made by way of a letter before an appellate authority even without filing a revised return if the facts with regard to the same are 3 Assessment Year: 2010-2011 already available on record before the lower authorities and they remain undisputed.
Accordingly the grounds no. 1 to 4 raised by the assessee in for the Asst. Year 2008-09 and ground nos. 1 to 5 raised by the assessee in ITA No. 451/Kol/2013 for the Asst. Year 2009-10 are allowed”.
As the issue involved in the year under consideration as well as all the material facts relevant thereto are similar, we respectfully follow the order of the Coordinate Bench of this Tribunal for the said years and uphold the impugned order of the ld. CIT(Appeals) in directing the Assessing Officer not to assess the total income of the assessee by application of section 115JB of the Act.
In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open Court on 20th day of December, 2017.
Sd/- Sd/- (S.S. Viswanethra Ravi) (P.M. Jagtap) Judicial Member Accountant Member Kolkata, the 20th day of December, 2017 Copies to : (1) Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-9(1), Kolkata, Aayakar Bhawan, P-7, Chowringhee Square, Kolkata-700 069 2) M/s. Damodar Valley Corporation, DVC Towers, VIP Road, Ultadanga, Kolkata-700 054 (3) CIT(Appeals)-15, Kolkata, (4) CIT- , Kolkata, (5) The Departmental Representative (6) Guard File TRUE COPY By Order
Senior Private Secretary, Head of Office/DDO, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Kolkata Benches, Kolkata Laha/Sr. P.S.
More judgments on Section 115JB
- Azure Knowledge Corporation Private… vs The Dy.CIT, Circle-1(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2013/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Digjam Limited, Jamnagar vs The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 349/RJT/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Braithwaite & Co. Ltd., Kolkata vs DCIT, Circle 1(1), KolkataITA 1076/KOL/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2021-2022
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 964/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur… vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 963/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026