SITA SHAW,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 40(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the ex parte order of the CIT(A) and remanded the matter back for fresh adjudication. This was done on the grounds of natural justice, as the assessee did not receive proper notice and the CIT(A) did not pass a speaking order.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was decided ex parte. The assessee claimed not to have received a notice of hearing from the CIT(A). The CIT(A) also failed to pass a speaking order.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) order was passed in violation of natural justice due to lack of notice and failure to pass a speaking order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH : KOLKATA
Before: Shri J.Sudhakar Reddy, AM ]
For the Appellant : None For the Revenue : Shri Sanjay Mukherjee, Addl. CIT Date of Hearing : 28.12.2017 Date of Pronouncement : 28.12.2017 ORDER This appeal by the assessee arises out of the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-12, Kolkata [ in short the ld CITA] dated 28.06.2017 against the order passed by the ITO, Ward-40(2), Kolkata [ in short the ld AO] under section 147/143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”) dated 16.03.2015 for the Assessment Year 2008-09.
None appeared on behalf of the assessee despite any issuing of notice.
We find that the Ld. CIT(A) has passed an ex parte order. The assessee in its grounds states that he did not receive any notice of hearing from the Ld. CIT(A).
We also find that the Ld. CIT(A) has not passed the speaking order. Under the circumstances I set aside this appeal to the file of the first appellate authority for fresh adjudication in accordance with law on the grounds of natural justice. The assessee
Sita Shaw A.Yr.2008-09 shall appear before the Ld. CIT(A) on 14.02.2018, take notice and thereafter co-operate in disposing off the appeal.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026