M/S HILLTOP BUILDERS PVT. LTD.,NAINITAL vs. ACIT, NAINITAL
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the orders of the lower authorities and restored the matter to the Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer was directed to re-examine the issue in light of a jurisdictional High Court judgment.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed a deduction under Section 80-IC of the Income-tax Act, which was rejected by the lower authorities. The assessee's appeal was filed for the assessment year 2010-11.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the allowability of the deduction claimed by the assessee under Section 80-IC of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal considered a similar matter decided by the jurisdictional High Court.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Before: SHRI G.D. AGRAWALG.D. AGRAWAL & AND BEFORE SHRI G.D. AGRAWALG.D. AGRAWAL & AND SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARGSHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG
PER G.D. AGRAWAL, VP PER G.D. AGRAWAL, VP :- PER G.D. AGRAWAL, VP PER G.D. AGRAWAL, VP This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2010-11 is directed against the order of learned CIT(A)-II, Dehradun dated 25th July, 2013.
The only ground raised by the assessee in this appeal is the allowability of claim of deduction under Section 80-IC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 amounting to `54,33,603/-, which has been rejected by the authorities below.
At the time of hearing before us, it was pointed out by the learned counsel that Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court has considered similar matter in judgment dated 16th June, 2016 in of 2012 and others in the case of CIT, Dehradun Vs. M/s Aanchal Hotels Pvt.Ltd.
2 ITA-5609/Del/2013 and has set aside the matter to the file of the Assessing Officer for re- examination in the light of guidelines given by their Lordships.
In view of the above, we deem it proper to set aside the orders of authorities below and restore the matter to the file of the Assessing Officer and direct him to re-examine the issue in the light of judgment of Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of M/s Aanchal Hotels Pvt.Ltd. (supra). Needless to mention that he will allow adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is deemed to be allowed for statistical purposes. Decision pronounced in the open Court on 28.11.2016.
More judgments on Section 80-IC
- Gmp Technical Solutions Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, MumbaiITA 6155/MUM/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- Lsj Biotech Private Limited, Igc, Aidc… vs Incometax Officer, Ward-1, Aayakar Bhawan…ITA 465/GTY/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed3 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- ACIT, Rajkot vs Crystal Global Industries, RajkotITA 538/RJT/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed31 Aug 2026AY 2014-15
- ACIT, Rajkot vs Crystal Global Industries, RajkotITA 537/RJT/2025[2013]Status: Disposed31 Aug 2026
- Crystal Global Industries, Rajkot vs ACIT, Circle-2(1), RajkotITA 508/RJT/2025[2011-12]Status: Disposed31 Aug 2026AY 2011-12
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Ritika Ispat PVT. LTD.,Balanda, Sundergarh vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 4 Nov 2026
- M/S Shree Sai Jagannath, Rourkela, Sundargarh vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, BhubaneswarOrissa · 4 Nov 2026
- M/S.Shree Construction, Khordha vs. The Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 4 Nov 2026
- Pramod Kumar Behera vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 4 Nov 2026
- Santosh Kumar Pradhan (Late Biswabhar Pradhan) vs. The Chief Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise And Customs, BhubaneswarOrissa · 4 Nov 2026