SRI JAGADGURU SHIVANAND HUMAN WELFARE ASSOCIATION,GADAG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTIONS), WARD-1, HUBBALI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had filed a petition for condoning the delay in filing Form 10B. The Tribunal decided to remand the appeal back to the CIT(A) to consider the appeal based on the outcome of this petition.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable trust, claimed exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for AY 2022-23. The exemption was disallowed because Form 10B was not filed within the prescribed time limit. The CIT(A) upheld this disallowance.
What were the issues?
Whether the exemption under Section 11 could be denied for non-filing of Form 10B within the prescribed time limit. Whether the delay in filing Form 10B can be condoned.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE “A” BENCH, BANGALORE
Sri Jagadguru Shivanand ITO (Exemption), Ward-1 Human Welfre Association C.R. Building, Navanagar vs. Gadag 582103, Karnataka Hubli 580025 PAN – AAGAS0911F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Shri Kashinath Kalamath, Advocate Revenue by: Ms. Neha Sahay, Ld. JCIT-DR Date of hearing: 21.10.2024 Date of pronouncement: 23.10.2024 O R D E R Per: Padmavathy S., A.M. This appeal by the assessee is against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Prayagraj [CIT(A)] dated 20.08.2024 for Assessment Year (AY) 2022-23.
The assessee is a charitable trust and obtained registration u/s. 12 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). The assessee filed return of income for AY 2022-23 on 06.11.2022 declaring Nil income. The return was processed u/s. 143(1) of the Act by the CPC in which the entire gross receipts of Rs. 50,67,850/- claimed by the assessee as exempt u/s. 11 of the Act was disallowed. The reason for the denial of benefit u/s. 11 was that the assessee did not file Form 10B within the time limit prescribed. On further appeal the ld. CIT(A) upheld the disallowance stating that the CIT(A) does not have the
We have heard the rival contentions and perused the material on record. The benefit of exemption u/s. 11 is denied to the assessee for the reason that the assessee has not filed Form 10B within the time limit prescribed. During the course of hearing it is brought to our attention that the assessee has filed a petition for condoning the delay in filing Form 10B belatedly before the CIT (Exemption). Considering the facts of the present case we deem it fit to remand the appeal back to the CIT(A) with a direction of consider the appeal based on the outcome of the petition filed by the assessee before the CIT(E) for condoning the delay in filing Form 10B and decide in accordance with law. It is ordered accordingly.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open Court on 23rd October, 2024.
More judgments on Section 11
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 531/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 530/NAG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026