SRI. PRASANNA VEERANJANEYA SEVA TRUST,BANGALORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), BANGALORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1970/BANG/2024Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore22 November 20243 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal observed that the assessee contended that it had uploaded requisite details which were not considered. Therefore, the Tribunal decided to grant one more opportunity to the assessee to represent its case before the CIT(Exemption).

What were the facts?

The assessee, a trust engaged in charitable activities, applied for permanent registration under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(Exemption) issued two notices which the assessee failed to comply with, leading to the dismissal of the application.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee was denied a proper opportunity to present its case before the CIT(Exemption) for grant of registration under Section 80G.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80G

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, A BENCH: BANGALORE

Before: SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI & SHRI PRAKASH CHAND YADAV

Hearing: 21.11.2024Pronounced: 22.11.2024

PER PRAKASH CHAND YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER:

1.

Present appeal of the assessee is arising from the order of ld. CIT(Exemption), Bangalore dated 26.9.2024 having DIN & Order No.ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/2024-25/1069120848(1) and it relates to denial of exemption u/s 80G of the Act.

2.

Brief facts of the case are that assessee is a Trust and engaged in Charitable activities as found mentioned in the trust deed annexed in Paper Book at Page Numbe-16. The assessee has applied for permanent registration for obtaining the certificate u/s 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “The Act”). It is not in dispute that Sri Prasanna Veeranjaneya Seva Trust, Bangalore Page 2 of 3 the assessee has already been granted permanent registration u/s 12A of the Act. For the impugned proceedings the ld. CIT(Exemption) issued two notices to the assessee dated 26.7.2024 and 20.8.2024. These notices of the ld. CIT(Exemption) remained un-complied with by the assessee and hence, the ld. CIT(Exemption) dismissed the request of the assessee for granting the registration u/s 80G of the Act.

3.

Aggrieved with the order of ld. CIT (Exemption), assessee has come up in appeal before us and raised number of grounds. However, the main prayer of the counsel for the assessee is that an opportunity of being heard may kindly be granted to the assessee for representing his case before the ld. CIT(Exemption).

4.

The ld. D.R. appearing on behalf of the revenue relied upon the order of ld. CIT(Exemption).

5.

After considering the rival submissions, we observe that it is a case where two notices issued by ld. CIT (Exemption) remained un- complied with by the assessee. The contention of the assessee is that it has uploaded the requisite details before the ld. CIT (Exemption) and the same were not considered at all. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the view that one more opportunity for representing his case before the CIT(E) is to be granted to the assessee. Accordingly, we restore the matter to the file of ld. CIT(Exemption) for deciding the application of the assessee with respect to the grant of registration u/s 80G of the Act in accordance with law. Needless to say that the Ld CIT(E) will afford meaningful opportunity to the assessee before passing any order.

Sri Prasanna Veeranjaneya Seva Trust, Bangalore Page 3 of 3 6. In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 22nd Nov, 2024

More judgments on Section 80G

All 6,482 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80G →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →