MR. PRATAPA GOUDA PATIL,MASKI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1 , RAICHUR
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal observed that the CIT(A) had not passed the order in accordance with the provisions of section 250(6) of the Act, and sufficient opportunity may not have been granted. Therefore, the matter was restored to the CIT(A) for adjudication afresh.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed its return of income, declaring both regular income and agricultural income. The AO taxed the entire agricultural income as unexplained cash credit as the assessee could not substantiate its genuineness. The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was disposed of ex-parte without sufficient opportunity.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) was justified in disposing of the appeal ex-parte without granting sufficient opportunity to the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A’’ BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI & SHRI PRAKASH CHAND YADAV
PER PRAKASH CHAND YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
Present appeal of the assessee is arising from the order of ld. CIT(A) dated 24.8.2024 having DIN & Order No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-25/1067951848(1) passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “The Act”) for the AY 2020-21.
The assessee has raised six grounds of appeal out of which ground Nos.1 & 6 are general in nature. In ground No.2, counsel for the assessee has contended that the ld. CIT(A) is not justified in disposing of the appeal ex-parte without granting sufficient opportunity to the assessee. Ld. Counsel for the assessee further stated that if the Hon’ble Bench will grant one more opportunity to the assessee, the assessee will argue his case on merits before the ld.
3. Ld. D.R. appearing on behalf of revenue could not seriously object to the prayer of the assessee.
We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. We observe that in this case, the assessee has filed its return of income on 13.1.2021 declaring an income of Rs.22,39,350/- and agricultural income of Rs.34,06,800/. During the course of assessment proceedings, the AO called for the details of agricultural income from the assessee. However, the assessee could not be able to substantiate the genuineness of agricultural income before the AO. Accordingly, the AO taxed the entire agricultural income as unexplained cash credit u/s 68 of the Act. We observe that before ld. CIT(A), no one appeared from the side of assessee, even after the issuance of four notices from the office of ld. CIT(A). We further observe that though it is mentioned in the order of ld. CIT(A) that four notices were issued to the assessee. However, it has not been pointed in categorical terms that as to whether any notice was actually served upon the assessee regarding the hearing of the appeal before ld. CIT(A). Be that as it may, we further observe that the ld. CIT(A) has also not passed the order in accordance with provisions of section 250(6) of the Act. Therefore, considering all the facts ad circumstances of the case, we restore this matter to the file of ld. CIT(A) for adjudication afresh.
4.1 Needless to say, the ld. CIT(A) will afford reasonable opportunity to the assessee before passing any order.
Order pronounced in the open court on 28th Nov, 2024
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026