IDEAL CHEMI PLAST PVT LTD,THANE vs. ASST. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee contended that PF and gratuity were paid before the due date and the bonus/commission pertained to the relevant assessment year. An auditor's certificate was placed on record, which was allegedly not considered by the CIT(A). The Tribunal deemed it appropriate to restore the file to the Assessing Officer to examine the auditor's certificate and other supporting documents.
What were the facts?
The assessee is in appeal against the disallowance of contributions towards Provident Fund (PF) and gratuity amounting to Rs. 8,72,245/-, and amount payable to employees as bonus/commission of Rs. 75,97,577/-, under Section 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The disallowance was made due to alleged discrepancy between the return of income and the Audit Report.
What were the issues?
Whether the disallowance of PF, gratuity, bonus, and commission under Section 43B is justified based on the provided auditor's certificate and supporting documents.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “CE”, MUMBAI
ORDER आदेश आदेश PER VIKAS AWASTHY, JM: This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [in short ‘the CIT(A)’] dated 29/07/2023, for Assessment Year 2020-21.
Shri Satya Prakash Singh appearing on behalf of the assessee submitted that the assessee is in appeal against disallowance of contributions towards Provident Fund(PF) and gratuity Rs.8,72,245/- and amount payable to employees as bonus/commission Rs.75,97,577/- u/s.43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short ‘the Act’]. The ld.Authorized Representative of the assessee submitted that the return of income of the assessee for Assessment Year 2020- 21 was processed u/s. 143(1) of the Act vide intimation dated 18/12/2021. An addition of Rs.84,,69,822/- (Rs.8,72,245 + Rs.75,97,577) u/s. 43B of the Act was made stating to be discrepancy between the return of income and Audit Report. He asserted that the aforesaid amounts were not strictly required to be reported in Audit Report separately. The said amounts are part of total addition reported in Schedule BP-Part-A(Row-18) and included in Rs.95,86,092/-. The disallowance made u/s. 43B of the Act has resulted in disallowances of the same amount twice. The assessee carried the issue in appeal before the CIT(A). The assessee submitted that Bank Statement to show that the amount towards gratuity and PF were deposited well in time as provided in respective Acts. Further, the assessee had also furnished ledger account to show that the provision of bonus was for the period 01/04/2019 to 31/03/2020, pertaining to Assessment Year 2020-21. The CIT(A) without appreciating the documents on record confirmed the addition, hence, the present appeal. The ld.Authorized Representative of the assessee submitted that the Auditors of the assessee has issued fresh Certificate (at page 28 of paper book) the same was placed before the CIT(A), however, the same was not considered by him.
Per contra, Shri H.M.Bhatt representing the Department vehemently defended the impugned order and prayed for dismissing appeal of the assessee.
Both sides heard, orders of authorities below examined. The solitary issue in appeal is against disallowance made u/s. 43B of the Act. During the course of assessment proceedings an adjustment of Rs.8,72,245/- was made on account of gratuity and PF and Rs.75,97,577/- were disallowed in respect of bonus and commission payable to the employees on the ground that there is inconsistency in the return and Auditors report. The assessee has placed on record a Certificate from the Auditors. The contention of the assessee is that PF and gratuity amounts were paid before the due date as specified under the relevant Acts and the bonus and commission to the employees pertain to the period relevant to the Assessment Year under appeal. Taking into consideration entire facts, we deem it appropriate to restore the file to the Assessing Officer to examine the Certificate dated 23/05/2022 issued by the Auditors ( at pages 28 and 29 of the paper book) and other supporting documents placed on record. The Assessing Officer shall re-examine the issue and allow reasonable opportunity to the assessee to make submissions and explain before passing the order, in accordance with law.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.
Order pronounced in the open court on Friday the 5th day of January, 2024.
More judgments on Section 43B
- Vco Consulatatns and Sevices Private… vs ITO, Corporate Ward 3(3), ChennaiITA 2145/CHNY/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Siemens Gamesa Renewable Power Private… vs The Dy CIT Circle 8(2)(1), MumbaiITA 8020/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Amritvarsha Industries Limited, Ambedkar… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 6481/DEL/2026[2010-2011]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2010-2011
- Karaj Singh, Haryana vs PCIT (Central) Gurgaon, GurgaonITA 642/CHANDI/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- ACIT, Mumbai vs Imp Powers Limited, MumbaiITA 4982/MUM/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Shadab Malik vs. State Of U.P. And 2 OthersAllahabad · 26 Oct 2026