M/S. VAN-OORD INDIA PVT. LTD,MUMBAI vs. ACIT CIR 5(3) (2) , MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the Tonnage Tax Scheme (TTS) is a self-contained code and its computation provisions override Chapter X (transfer pricing). Therefore, transfer pricing adjustments are not applicable to income computed under TTS.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Van Oord India Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income and was assessed with additions on account of transfer pricing adjustments. The CIT(A) deleted these additions, leading to cross-appeals by both the assessee and the revenue.
What were the issues?
Whether transfer pricing provisions apply to income computed under the Tonnage Tax Scheme, and if the CIT(A) was correct in deleting transfer pricing adjustments.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 92(1),Section 115VA,Section 115VG
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Vodafone India Services (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India172 citing369 ITR 511 · 2014 · HC
- DCIT v. Total Oil India Pvt. Ltd.115 citing149 Taxmann.com 332 · 2023 · ITAT
- Trib.) Giesecke & Devrient 16.994%). India Pvt Ltd. v. ACIT52 citing120 Taxmann.com 338 · 2020 · HC
- Vodafone Services Pvt.ltd. v. UOI13 citing53 Taxmann.com 286 · 2015 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “J”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA & SHRI GAGAN GOYAL&
PER GAGAN GOYAL, A.M: These cross appeals by Assessee and Revenue are directed against the order of Ld. CIT (A) – 55, Mumbai dated 20.09.2021 passed u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) for A.Y. 2012-13. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:-
GROUNDS OF APPEAL On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, Van Oo
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 92(1)
- Vodafone West Limited, (Formerly Known As… vs The Dy.CIT, Circle-4(1)(2), AhmedabadITA 671/AHD/2015[2010-11]Status: Disposed11 Dec 2025AY 2010-11
- The Dy CIT, Circle-4(1)(2), Ahmedabad vs Vodafone West Limited, AhmedabadITA 1634/AHD/2015[2010-11]Status: Disposed11 Dec 2025AY 2010-11
- 3M India Limited, Bangalore vs DCIT, BangaloreITA 168/BANG/2016[2011-12]Status: Disposed11 Sept 2025AY 2011-12
- Quintiles Inc., Mumbai vs DCIT (It) Cir 3(3)(1), MumbaiITA 728/MUM/2017[2013-14]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2025AY 2013-14
- Quintiles Inc., Mumbai vs DCIT (Intl. Tax) Range 3(3)(1), MumbaiITA 2104/MUM/2016[2012-13]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2025AY 2012-13
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026